Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is The Satire Obvious Enough In This New Painting?

The Latin phrase, generally translated, means ‘The true essence of art is to conceal the artistry’ or sometimes translated as ‘The true value of art is in it’s subtlety.’

http://pics.livejournal.com/unmired/pic/000k40cf/g...

Using this mantra as the criteria, would more flamboyant, over-the-top, modern abstract art (from Abstract Expressionist to Pop) qualify? Or it art for it's own sake enough to qualify it as true art?

About this new painting itself, your opinions are welcome.

I'm honestly not sure what my motives were (outside of trying to make a satiric statement) for painting this but I do love the inner-action of the grids with the color fields.

(The image can be enlarged to view more detail with your basic double-click of the mouse.)

1 Answer

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Hi Doc

    I think it fits very well with "The true value of art is in it's subtlety".

    With that translation there is no need for it to be a more flamboyant work.

    I like like the color interactions in the grid also.

    I also can make out subtle texture which I like also.

    The message is great & there are so many motives or intent to art.

    Sometimes the abstracts get lost on people, especially when the art is more about color & texture than a realistic interpretation.

    Nice to see you again.

    Many Blessings!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.