chelsea fc,what happened to lukaku?

His career has been destroyed and his potential sabotaged. That's what Chelsea FC does to players.

He joins Geremi, Veron, Parker, Sidwell, and Kalou among others as players whose career simply never recovered from the attempted suicide that is joing Chelsea.

greater useful purchase than maximum folk might think of inspite of the flow fee... Anelka probable leaving after one greater season and so ought to Drogba while his settlement runs out next summer time. That recommend their would be 2 strikers; Torres and Lukaku. Sturridge, Kalou and Malouda enjoying as wingers. Kalou ought to leave nonetheless and get replaced with a greater useful and speedier winger. If McEachran steps up in the subsequent 3 hundred and sixty 5 days then don't be stunned if Chelsea do no longer purchase a sparkling midfielder yet that seems exceptionally unlikely. Cole is barely in basic terms 30 and nevertheless has some years left in him, inspite of each and every thing he's the worlds terrific leftback.

Chelsea only brought him because they wanted to own his contract ahead of any other team.

That's fair enough I guess, but they should've loaned him IMMEDIATLEY. It was obvious he wouldn't be good enough to play regular games for Chelsea's first team and he deserves more than just reserve football. So even if that meant that Chelsea loan him back to Anderlecht for this season if they couldn't find another Championship or EPL club to take him, as he needs first team football.

He's not good enough for the first team, so I don't see why AVB doesn't try and loan him out like United has done with Macheda.

Lukaku isn't that, well, good. He was signed purely off of hype