Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Call a let on match point from a ball falling from opponents pocket?
Ok , I am a little upset , and I understand it is recreational tennis but after playing 3 hour match of very intensive back and forth tennis and digging myself out of 0-4 third set hole I was in I got a little frustrated by the following call.
Opponent is serving 5-6 add out and serves a slow kick serve to my forehand ( no doubt from the pressure of serving at such important point ) I run around my back hand and I hit a really nice powerful forehand shot to his backhand side , he stops the ball and calls a let because a ball had fallen out of his pocket , and claims another first serve , which to my dismay and I miss and he gets two easy points off his serve after that , I was arguing with him about the rules and how he broke them but instead said that "I thought you would be concerned about me falling down on the ball" yada yada , I was distracted the rest of the match and lost in the tie breaker ,he then went to the place we work at the next day and told everyone he had won .
What would you had done ?
no he is not , please read bellow on this link http://www.usta.com/Improve-Your-Game/Rules/Distra...
Q. What is the ruling when a ball falls out of the opponent's pocket and is a distraction?
A. You need to look at two scenarios – one without on-court officials and one with on-court officials.
If there are NO officials on court: If a ball falls from the pocket of a player or falls from the hand of the player during a point, that player cannot call the let since he/she created the hindrance. It is up to the opponent to call the hindrance and play a let. This call must be made immediately and not after the point has been played out.
5 Answers
- ChuckLv 79 years agoFavorite Answer
In "The Code - Players Guide for Matches When Officials Are Not Present" I found this:
[The asterisks were added by me for emphasis]
"34. Let due to unintentional hindrance.
A player who is hindered by an opponent's unintentional act or by something else outside of the player's control is entitled to a let only if the player could have made the shot had the player not been hindered. ***A let is not authorized for a hindrance caused by something within a player's control.*** For example, a request for a let because a player tripped over the player's own hat should be denied."
As I read this, your opponent had control of the tennis ball[s] in his pocket, and so therefore, as in the "hat example," he was not entitled to call on let on that basis.
If, as a co-worker, he brags about beating you in tennis to others at work, I would avoid playing him in the future. If you must play him again in a tournament or team match, demand a chair umpire. Otherwise, refuse to play him.
Taking this a step further, playing singles with people you work with seems like asking for trouble, because one person is almost always going home at least a little bit unhappy. Somebody has to lose. We used to read cartoons about people playing golf with the boss; that was also a recipe for trouble, IMHO. In tennis, it's worse than golf, due to the one-on-one-combat element of the sport.
With such a person as this, talking about the ruling in the results here likely won't help you either. He can just use your argument to call you a sore loser or some other name.
Let it pass, and learn from the experience: Don't play singles with co-workers, or if you do, make sure it's with someone whose sportsmanship is unquestionable and someone who will *not* make an issue of the result. Doubles is usually a lot less intense, as you must know.
Source(s): "Friend at Court," or "Rules of Tennis," by the United States Tennis Association http://www.ustashop.com/ <-- click on "Books" in the left-hand side of the page - ?Lv 45 years ago
I just want to add something. I always have to laugh when people tell me that the only real way to play pool is by having to call everything. Two things... 1. I play real pool and those are not the rules. It's ball in hand, call your pocket. 2. 99.9% of the people who play "call everything" are not good enough to even play that way. Heck, the best players in the world clip balls and run rails unintentionally.
- Take these WordsLv 79 years ago
The truth of the matter is, you didn't lose the match because of one point.
No one ever loses a match because of one point. You played a ton of points. If you were better than your opponent, it wouldn't have gotten to 6-5 in the third.
- ?Lv 79 years ago
Actually, according to USTA rules, he was right to call a let for that. I had to look up the rule because I wasn't aware of it either. Sorry that happened I can only imagine how frustrated you must have been.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 9 years ago
I'm the one who called the let. I bought he gatorades for the match, 32oz each. I thought you were my friend who would understand that I could have broken my ankle because of the ball!!!
So thanks bro, from now on drink water....from a pond.
I will be filing a lawsuit in the 5th court of Florida because of emotional distress.
Source(s): Burger King