why does snoops report that Obamas Connecticut SSN story is false ?

Because its false? 'American Thinker' is a right wing rag that dishonors the First amendment by failing to appreciate evidence. Birthers could see a video of the infant Obama being born on a video tape with the words 'HAWAII' in the background surrounded by every elected official in the state smiling and chanting 'this is Hawaii' and someone would still consider it a fake. The president had One SSN. ONE.

From the actual article:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/ssn....

Read the part at the very bottom that explains why he has the SSN prefix that he does.

Do you have any actual direct refutations against anything the snopes article claims? Area prefixes prior to 1973 were based on the mailing address of the application for the SSN, not on the area where the person was born. Try researching things before you make yourself stupid.

Read the article. It explains why the claim is false.

If you are interested in accuracy, you might try "snopes" instead of "snoops".

because Snopes is becoming less and less of an articulate and accurate site by the day.

-I used to use that site pretty often.....and even rely on it. I've since looked up two separate issues in which I knew extensively about and found that they were??? well not incorrect but definitely MISLEADING.

Hold for example, I have to think about what it was..

Did you actually READ the Snopes article? Try it.