UK would you vote for a party that made carrying concealed firearms legal.?

There are a handful of issues with this question.

First of all, you appear to be the UK equivalent of a Sovereign Citizen. The suggestions you are making are based on a complete lack of understanding of US law (which is where the idea came from and is incorrect there anyway) and you are trying to apply it to UK law (where it is even more incorrect). The only thing you've forgotten to mention is that a gold fringe on the court flags indicate that it is an admiralty court - possibly because even those brainless morons at TPUC have managed to notice that there are no flags in a UK courtoom. The entire "additional details" section as it stands at time of writing is completely baseless, uneducated and risible bunkum. When addressing people, do you also refer to yourself as "The representative of the corporation know as..."?

As for the rest of it... well the main question text doesn't exactly follow on from the title so I think it's fair to break them down.

"Legalising concealed carry" would not in itself be a good reason to vote for any party. Confining yourself to single-issue politics is a dangerous approach. Just because someone is offering one thing that you want, it doesn't mean that the rest of their policies are sound.

I would personally prefer to see a government shifting rights and responsibilities back to the general public - sometimes referred to as "less laws, better enforcement", pretty much the opposite of the "nanny state" that has taken hold in recent years. It is fair to assume that a political party advocating legal concealed carry is theoretically likely to support a stance that I would agree with, so I would be inclined to give their policies closer consideration. Any decision would be made based on the policies as a whole, however, not that single issue.

You then go on to address terror legislation. The "terror" business justifies far too many jobs, budgets and powers to be given up lightly, we are not going to see the back of it for some time. On the other hand, there are credible threats to the UK that need to be addressed. Does that concern warrant the sheer volume of things that can get you investigated as a potential terrorist these days? The sheer volume of things banned because you might possibly conceivably combine them to make something that goes "pop", at the expense of 60 million other perfectly sensible users with many good reasons to want them? Not in my personal opinion. Just as I believe in "less laws, better enforcement", I also believe that we shouldn't be trading essential liberties for temporary safety.

You then make a third shift to questioning the actions and alleged criminality of governments across the world and question whether we have the right to overthrow them. Well that depends on what you think the law is. There are no legal grounds (as you would understand them) for this in the UK or nearly any other country. The US, arguably, yes, if the circumstances arose. If you consider that the only single "natural" or "inalienable" law in existence is that "the person with the biggest stick makes the rules" then, for as long as the government holds (and is willing to use) the biggest stick, what they say, goes. Revolution is when someone else picks up a bigger stick and uses it. The fabled US 2nd Amendment is about making sure "the people" always had access to a bigger stick than "the government" should the need arise.

In the midst of your rambling, uneducated and at times pointless question(s) (which, let's face it, were largely rhetorical and an opportunity for you to vent your half-baked ideology cut'n'pasted from a website justifying dodging whatever tax you didn't want to pay), you touch on some interesting topics. This isn't "Yahoo Answer" territory however; it's a long and extended debate that needs to be had. Probably not with you, though.

You may not trust the government but I would not trust all those who might want to carry a concealed weapon. Your rant about the law of the sea makes no sense.

Firearms are illegal to be carried in Public and all handguns were made illegal years ago.

Your scenario will not happen, there are strong restrictions to owning a firearm in the UK

No, I'd certainly vote against one.