Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
the higgs boson particle, possible a photon in disguise?
Some time ago, in a magazine in a deep pile in a stack in my studio, maybe it was sci-am or discover or omni or some such thing, I saw an illustration that has haunted me for 20 some odd years, it was a practical illustration of a ball breaking out of a computer monitor, perhaps some of you recall this. Well Since the "Higgs Boson" particle has become such an issue I have had a theory os a particle that can travel faster than time but only for the tiniest portion of a nano second, meaning it would have to expand to an enormous size and then either explode or evaporate, in so doing (especially in a facility like cern) it would certainly explain and explosion in the magnetic ring before the particle got to one of the two staions for collecting, you have to recall the the two beams that run in opposite directions are only kept in line by a magnetic field but if two particles somehow fell out of the field by accident for whatever the cause might be and hit each other, the colision force would be enourmous and the lone particle would be immense.....so does anyone think the Higgs Boson could be a ordinary particle like a photon that has gathered more mass than normal or in a different state of flux or happenstance?....cuz if this is the case,...the Higgs Boson would be very rare indeed on earth but possibly very common near a quasar or pulsar.....anybody agree?......or does this just seem crazy? cuz I have other ideas about ordinary particles who then camoflage themselve's as other particles in certain situations.....I'm no supporter of string thoery or the big bang though I'm a supporter on the here and now and curious about what particles might exists on the very smallest of scales, things we cannot detect because our machines are so incredibly big. I think we need to build a bigger accelerator with larger dectotors and incredibly smaller camera types in every spectrum.
2 Answers
- John BLv 69 years ago
The problem with your "theories" is that they are really just speculations. You use meaningless terms and phrases like "travel faster than time", "explode or evaporate", "a photon that has gathered more mass than normal", "a different state of flux or happenstance", and "ordinary particles who then camoflage themselves as other particles". Unless you have concrete explanations for these terms and speculations, nobody can understand what you are trying to say. Furthermore, a legitimate theory must be testable. Your "theories" are too imprecise and too ambiguous to be testable.
- linchetaLv 44 years ago
interior the e book of James interior the hot testomony you will detect a quote that is going something like this: "faith without works is ineffective". yet in nevertheless yet another new testomony place you detect that "Salvation comes by way of faith and not of works, lest any guy would desire to boast." Do those 2 contradict one yet another? i don't think of so. in case you used your trustworthy faith immediately to settle for Jesus and died an instantaneous later without time for solid works, you will nevertheless bypass to heaven only like the thief on the bypass. on the different hand, in case you're saying you're a christian, and you reside like the devil then greater effective than probable, the certainty isn't in you. the solid e book says we are able to tell a tree by ability of the fruit it bears. If somebody have been rather stored for any length of time, beginning out as a non secular infant, solid works would start to seem and works of the devil would surely decrease and ultimately bypass away. yet all of us would desire to strengthen. continually.