So, finally, the assassins of Jews in France were muslims?

Of course they were muslims! And the truth is we all , including muslims themselves, knew this from the start. The usual muslims "defense tactic" when some of their co-religionists commit a horrible crime is:

1. To deny that he was muslim. Then, when they terrorist gets caught and this tactic does not work any more, the tactic number two is used;

2. " He does not interpret islam correctly". Then, when the guy himself confesses that he committed the attack by the direct instruction from the Koran and says he killed the French paratroopers because they "apostated from islam" by participating in hte combat operations against muslims, the defenders of the murderers use the tactic number 3:

3. "There are over a billion of muslims in the world, you can not judge all for the bad acts committed by few". When they are put nose in the statistics that is very clear: 94% of the total number of the terrorist attacks in the world are committed by muslims; 50% of muslims supported Osama bin Laden shen he was alive, and over 50% of muslims said their attitude to the USA became worse after the American "Sea Seals" got Usama and killed him, muslims use the tactic number 4:

4. Don´t generalise";" "You are islamophobe"; "You are anti- muslim"; "You are a racist". This senseless set of labels launched by the Left in the Western society penetrated the brain of the Americans and Europeans very deep. The situation is absurd: those who kill and support the killer accuse the victims. And all the legion of the Left /liberals "useful idiots" immediately joins the muslim chorus and starts, against all evidence and with clever faces, to nod thoughtfully saying stupidities like muslims,"in general", are good people (as if a good person can not be a murderer!)

and that "islam is the religion of peace".

The main problem of the West is not muslims and their terrorism; the main problem of the West is the Left/liberal ideology that does not let the West defeat the muslim terrorists.

Yes he was a muslim. He also claims to be al-Qaeda HOWEVER, the soldiers killed WERE NOT STATIONED IN AFGHNISTAN. However I challenge you to find one factual error in my statements. Many assumed he was Muslim because he attacked a Jewish school. I NEVER said he wasn't Muslims, nor did I once offer EITHER a motive NOR made ANY guess on who it http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhWAn... Please point out ANYWHERE I stated whether or not the killer was Muslim. I NEVER said that the 17th nor the 1st regiments did not serve in Aghanistan, nor that the killings were NOT the result of retaliation. HOWEVER the soldiers in question DID NOT SERVE IN AFGHANISTAN.

Given the large number in far-right and rise of ultra-nationalism I didn't wish to start blindly accusing anyone as with the Norway shooting. It is a tragedy and I hope he is punished to the full extent of the Law.

@OMG no, I said it was for claiming the soldiers served in Afghanistan when THEY didn't. I still have yet to see ONE piece of evidence saying they did. One served in the French colonies, two in North Africa.

Interesting to see the way people work though. The way facts are manipulated to say one thing when in fact in doesn't say that at all. hmm never saw a Zionist do that before.

I will concede that even narrowminded bigots sometimes get it right. A broken clock is right twice a day after all!

Whether the terrorist was Muslim or not, is non-relevant issue the way I see Michardav's point which is that people started assuming that the terrorist was Muslim even before French authorities pointed fingers at anyone. So every time Jewish person is killed then we should assume It is an act of Muslim extremist?

And I don't see why the fuss about terrorist's religion! He was obviously sick individual just like the Christian shooter in Norway! 94% of terrorist attacks committed by Muslims? Really? According to Jihad-watch.com? By the way, here is the history of school shootings in the US alone:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_shooting

How many where committed by Muslims?

Its not just Muslims that murder children . Netanyahu and his non muslim colleagues did the same in the Gaza war where they murdered not 4 children but 352 children . Nobody condones the murder of children whether Jewish or Arab but at least this deranged man will face justice with his life or life in jail . Can the same be said with Netanyahu and his murderous colleagues ?

I agree that Michardav opened a can of worms here when he tried that tactic on people here.

Really, he was trying to make people feel bad for just assuming, or guessing, but not much else. For example, I did make the guess that it was a Muslim. I admit that, without any other knowledge than "Jewish kids murdered in France", that's where my thoughts go. Did I say that it's definitely one? No. Did I go against the Muslim community immediately for such? No.

Simply, I assumed such only because the last French Jewish murder that I heard of was also done by a Muslim. That's it - I was more chanting for the capture of the guy, irregardless of what he was. While I did make an assumption, I wasn't focusing on that.

It would be something like Michardav assuming that a Arab woman murdered in Israel was done by a Jew. Btw, the last murder of an Arab woman in Israel that I read wasn't a Jew, but another Arab, which is why I'd naturally and automatically assume another Arab.

Really, I do understand his ideal in being rash against condemning the attacker as Muslim without having knowledge. I do understand his point, which I do agree with. However, I hate how he himself is being rash.

the given information at the time seemed to indicate neo Nazis were to blame, not Muslims.

No Surprise to me.

The French Government is likely to claim it is not Islamic related or a terrorist act just like the US.

More them likely the press in the (Islamic) middle east will claim that it was Jews pretending to be Muslims and claim that it was an attempt to smear innocent Muslims. Most likely it will appear next to an article praising Osama Bin Laden but claiming he was innocent too.

the **** did i just read?

While he condemned those who assumed it was a Muslim, he assumed it wasn't, so either way, assumptions were being made by everyone, including him. That makes his question (and all the time and effort we spent answering it) completley pointless. He was proven wrong afterall and now seems to have egg on his face.

Pills help.