Is Breivik Mad Or Evil?

The slaughter was planned to the 'T'. It took him months, is that the work of someone mad, of course not.

The 'man' i an evil Nazi beast. Pity about that judge losing hi job by calling tor the death penalty

he's deranged. The case is to be certain whether he's "Criminally Insane", or, did he be attentive to on the time that he grew to become into doing incorrect, that he grew to become into breaking the regulation of the country whilst slaughtering harmless human beings for their political ideals. He honestly rang the Police to supply up formerly they arrived, to save his own epidermis, so it would seem that he grew to become into no longer insane on the time of the killings. The courtroom will go with at last... sarcastically, Norway isn't a considerable hub of Islam, he killed no Islamists...

his annalist said on tv last night, he did his deeds on the basis of rational intentions held by millions across europe.

The local authorities have decided that he is to stand trial which indicates that he is not mad. Now a free trial will decide on his guilt.

Is mad and evil much the same things.I understand he had links to the KKK and the BNP which does not say a lot about them! People like Hitler were insane and also a bad person.

I know people will say those with learning difficulties are not forced to be bad people.I do accept this.

Or maybe just systematic. Whether you like it or not, perhaps he just followed his beliefs to the enth degree. I think he just made a decision to do something and followed through with it. I don't condone his actions but it's easy to understand his motivation.

Breivik is the brother of geert wilders from holland!

misguided and cold blooded

but the media could be considered evil for trying to blame "far-right groups" to further their agenda

I'd suggest a bit of both, but more of the mad than the evil.

maybe e had the reason to do all those terror activities