Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 4
? asked in Education & ReferenceTrivia · 9 years ago

What's with all the apostrophes?

I've noticed lately that an awful lot of folks who place comments online are using apostrophes when trying to type plural nouns, like so: "Ton's of squirrel's are in my yard, climbing on the tree's." This is being done not only by those who sadly think the contraction "should've" is short for "should of" and so on, but by those who might otherwise seem to be relatively intelligent. Does anyone have any theories as to why? Serious replies only, please.

Update:

For those who have yet to respond, I should make clear that the phenomenon of using "should of" or "would of" etc., while distressing, is not of any significant mystery, nor did I intend to suggest that the contraction "should've" is not proper. These folks are simply misinterpreting their own speech, taking the phonetic sounds made as one pronounces the various contractions of "___ have" and mistakenly assuming that the second syllable is the word "of" rather than a shortened form of "have." Why folks are taking the requisite extra time to type an unnecessary (and ultimately incorrect) apostrophe into their plurals is what has left me baffled, and is the true crux of my inquiry. Thanks to all who have given this serious thought!

5 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 6
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    See Romans 1:22

  • 9 years ago

    Sadly, you are correct. I've noticed it in newspapers as well. It seems a simple 's' to signify plurality doesn't satisfy people any longer and they want something fancier.......

    As to the contractions, that baffles me. There really isn't any place in the English language for 'should of'' - at least, not the way it is being used. Instead of saying "He should have taken an earlier train" you often see "He should of taken an earlier train." Doesn't make sense, when you look at it and in fact, 'should've', as the abbreviation for 'should have' is what should be used.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    "Ton's of squirrel's are in my yard, climbing on the tree's."

    These errors are made by people who have not been taught or have not bothered to learn that an apostrophe does NOT signify a plural.

    "...sadly think the contraction "should've" is short for "should of"..."

    Here, the contraction " should've" is little-used but is correct because it is a contraction of "should have". ("Should of" is a common error.)

  • 9 years ago

    My guess is that it's to do with separating the S from its stem noun. (Is "stem" the right term?)

    In most instances in English, it's easy to identify the stem noun:

    • ton → tons

    • squirrel → squirrels

    • comment → comments

    However, this can get trickier when the noun's final letter is a vowel. In roughly increasing order of obscurity:

    • gate → gates

    • tree → trees

    • area → areas

    • emu → emus

    As they say in the classics, compare and contrast:

    • boas – alas – eras

    • aromas – Thomas – stigmas – fracas – deltas – atlas

    • ices – ides – axes – St. Ives – dives – Dives

    • semis – aegis – blinis – cassis – bikinis – derris – corgis

    • egos – Eros – dodos – adios – euros – Lagos – pesos

    • emus – plus – gnus – genus – jabirus

    • sinus – menus – minus

    • zebus – rebus

    Murkying the waters:

    • BMW → BMWs ?

    • IOU → IOUs ??

    • .exe → .exes ??

    • ETA → ETAs ??

    • A, B and C → As, Bs and Cs ???

    –––––––––––––––––––––

    As I mentioned, all this is just a guess. Still, the misuse of apostrophes isn't (yet) ubiquitou's. :)

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 9 years ago

    i've noticed that there are quite a few people that can't spell, but i haven't noticed -that- much apostrophe overuse.

    good gosh. the plethora of bad spellers scares me enough.

    now you say there are many who cannot punctuate as well??

    especially when it's as simple as your example?!

    the only reason that i can come up with is sheer laziness.

    i've been out of school more than many on here are old, but i do make the effort, sometimes to the extent of researching my doubts longer than it takes me to research an answer.

    it's really spooky when it's the students, presently in school, and, our future leaders.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.