Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Isn't the only fair way to tax people is to not tax them?

For if you lowered taxes on the poor and/or raised taxes on the rich, would that really be fair? The answer is no, because one group of people are then forced to bear the burden of paying for everyone else, which isn't fair.

If you taxed everyone at the same rate, regardless of whether or not they are rich or poor, would that be fair? The answer is no. Because it doesn't matter at what percentage the taxes are set at, if everyone would be taxed the same, the poor would bear a bigger burden from the taxes than the rich, which isn't fair.

So doesn't this mean that the only truly fair way to tax people is to not tax them in the first place?

Update:

@Trapped in The Wall

The founding fathers never tried this, at that time government operated off import/excise taxes.

Update 2:

@Alex

Somalia has plenty of taxation.

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    There isn't any fair way to tax people and no government has ever been interested in fair taxation. All laws and taxes are instituted based on how easy it is to collect. Fair does not even enter into it except as propaganda.

    That is, for example, why a used car is taxed but goods at a garage sale are not. You can conveniently keep track of the ownership of the car but not of cheap 2nd hand goods. It's all about ease of enforcement of the tax.

    Obviously it is going to be easier to collect taxes from people who actually have money to give up. That is why the rich and middle classes are taxed so. Why would they pursue taxes from poor people with no money? So propaganda is instituted to give the appearance of mercy for the sake of good press for the government. Yet if there was a way to do it without starting mass rioting, the government would tax every poor person to the last dollar if it could.

  • The Founding Fathers tried very few taxes at all, but found it to be disastrous. National defense was a joke, our coasts were being raided, trade ships destroyed by pirates and settlements destroyed by hostile Native Americans. It failed on epic proportions, but was worth a shot. So imagine what it would be like with no taxes at all

    The only fair way is to tax at an even rate. The poor will always be poor, and the rich will always be rich. Trying to make the poor rich and the rich poor just doesn't work. I would love for everyone to be able to afford a Mercedes and play a round of golf every Sunday, but it just can't happen.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    At which point there would be no money for the government, so there would be no programs or social safety nets available to protect the poor, and no government regulations to keep the rich from exploiting the poor. We've lived through that time before, it was called Victorian England. Known well for its child labor and sprawling poverty.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    9 years ago

    Taxes pay for the military, which keeps the 1% in power. If you run the world, that's fair.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • team
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    I think a certain percentage for everyone would be fair. If you make very little, then you pay very little in taxes

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Rich people are a ward of the State. Without the State, there would be no trusts and without any trusts there could be no 'aires.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Do you really think your silly little posts are going to get rid of taxes? Give it a rest. You are clogging up the forum

  • 9 years ago

    No taxes = Somalia. Is that REALLY what you want?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.