Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Condoleezza Rice can be Sec. of state but Susan Rice can't?

Condi Rice said WMD's were in Iraq. But that was incorrect info given to her. Susan Rice said protesters killed our Ambassador & 3 others in Libya. Why was C.Rice able to be Sec. of State but S. Rice shouldn't be?

20 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Because the cons want Scott Brown back in the Senate.

    They are hoping to get Obama to nominate John Kerry, leaving his Senate seat open. That will cause an election 2 weeks after his departure. They're hoping to get Scott Brown back via that election.

    Sneaky devils.

    ##

  • 5 years ago

    The UN is stuffed with conceited pinko communists which have an agenda to finish the rein of the western world. They hate capitalism and wish to enslave every body to their manufacturer of socialism. Susan Rice is one of them; Obama Regime robotic who should now not be taken significantly. She is a joke.

  • 9 years ago

    I was shocked to see how emotional and dramatic Obama spoke at his Press Conference when he was defending Susan Rice.

    Was it from guilt? He said she went out and related what the Intel at the White House told her to say. WHO at the White House? How many days in a row was she ordered to Lie?

    Condi Rice, on the other hand could get my vote if she ran for President in 2016!

    The woman is brilliant, disciplined, principled, and courageous.

    Republicans are supportive of the best of the best regardless of Race or Color.

    They do not support liars of any sort. Dems seem to lack basic common sense and focus on trivia.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Condi was having sex with bushie boy

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 9 years ago

    Let's take a look at Rice's involvement in the entire Libya fiasco, going back to March, 2011.

    Actually, Rice was one of the chief advocates for going into Libya in the first place...........against the advice of real experts. Looks like she was wrong then, as well.

    In fact, Rice and Hillary were wrong all along.

    "In joining Ms. Rice and Ms. Power, Mrs. Clinton made an unusual break with Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, who, along with the national security adviser, Thomas E. Donilon, and the counter terrorism chief, John O. Brennan, had urged caution. Libya was not vital to American national security interests, the men argued, and Mr. Brennan worried that the Libyan rebels remained largely unknown to American officials, and could have ties to Al Qaeda."

    Rice authored the UN Resolution authorizing the military intervention in Libya, and she and Hillary coerced votes from other member states in order to get it passed.

    “Hillary and Susan Rice were key parts of this story because Hillary got the Arab buy-in and Susan worked the U.N. to get a 10-to-5 vote, which is no easy thing,”

    "There was high drama right up to the surprising Security Council vote on Thursday night, when the ambassador for South Africa, viewed as critical to getting the nine votes needed to pass the resolution, failed to show up for the final vote, causing Ms. Rice to rush from the chamber in search of him."

    Read the entire story:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/19/world/africa/19p...

  • justa
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    Well you got your good ones, and you got your bad ones.

    Guess thats how Republicans see that.

  • 9 years ago

    Susan Rice is a Screw-Up which makes her fit right in Obama's Administration

    Susan Rice doesn't have the intelligence to be a County Clerk much less a Secretary of State

    Susan Rice isn't even smart enough to be a Secretary

  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    Condi was screwing war criminal GWB

  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    Because Condi was technically correct in her assessment, whereas Susan deliberately promulgated talking points known to be blatantly false at the time they were concocted.

    Source(s):
  • 9 years ago

    Well for one thing Condi's prospective boss (the President) didn't throw her under the bus like Obama basically did....

  • 9 years ago

    ones a con ones a dem. simple for the simple minded GOPers

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.