Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What do you think sparked the Civil War?
Who thinks it had anything to do with slavery?
Just curious....
Did you know that there were only 3 ports in the Union portion of the country at that time? The South had over 75% of the nation's ports. This is where the Federal Government heavily relied upon control and taxation over the states. Think of the revenue lost if the Federal Govt in the North would have lost 75% of its taxable ports. They wouldn't have been able to finance any of their projects.
Thus, the war was more about Lincoln trying to keep the country together as one for the sole purpose of maintaining maximum revenue for the Government.
Regarding slavery, the Emancipation Proclamation only freed slaves in the border states, and permitted slavery elsewhere. Lincoln was a tyrant who could have cared less about individal freedoms. He imprisoned 14,000 of his own citizens in the North for being outspoken AGAINST the war, including the Mayor of Baltimore. Lincoln also shutdown over 300 opposition newspapers. The President, many have high regards for, had no respe
...had no respect for the rule of law; the U.S. Constitution. He was in all forms of the matter, a tyrant. And Article 3 Section 3 defines treason as levying war against the states. The facts of history tell us Lincoln was a treasonous tyrant. Yet, so many of our Dept of Education books tell us he was a hero.
@Phillip H: Good information, you are a student of history. But wouldn't you say secession was the cause of the civil war? Mind you, secession was perfectly legal as well. The April 25, 1852 file for secession by South Carolina didn't focus on slavery, or Lincoln's election results. It was a culmination of a growing federal government that was NOT obeying the Constitution and NOT recognizing states rights. Slavery was one of many issues, but it was certainly not the main issue.
12 Answers
- lestermountLv 79 years agoFavorite Answer
The South felt the Northern states were taking advantage of the South being an agricultural economy while the North was a manufacturing economy.
Taxes, voting rights, bloc votes by sections of the states led to feelings of disenfranchisement among Southern states.
Slavery was a minor part, since the vast majority of Southern citizens did not own slaves and slave owners got credit for slaves in that property owners voted and non property owners did not the average people of the South despised the slave owners.
The North did not start the war to free slaves and the men fighting in the Confederate armies were not fighting to keep slavery.
- 5 years ago
i imagine it truly is somewhat not likely. there is an somewhat good danger that any assassination ought to stoke racial tensions in a large number of factors of the country, yet no longer some thing coming near civil warfare. even if, i imagine there is even a lot less of a danger of an assassination - Bush has been a really unpopular president throughout his presidency and he remains round. i imagine the some distance more advantageous in all probability "civil warfare" to ensue must be if the superdelegates interior the democratic celebration chosen to overturn even with verdict the human beings lay forth. it ought to splinter the celebration, for good, i imagine and may deliver about a politial civil warfare that ought to work out McCain into the white abode in '08.
- Philip HLv 79 years ago
Politics always relies on compromise. Lets look at the sequence of events.
America's founding fathers, from before the Declaration of Independence onward, wanted Liberty and small government with the power of choice in the hands of individual citizens. They knew that tyranny was always the result of Power at the head of any society. They understood that Power Corrupts.
Many did not want slavery when the Nation was formed but they also needed to have all 13 original colonies joining together so they compromised and permitted slavery, which was common world wide in that era. If they did not permit slavery, the Southern States would never have joined the Union and the United States of America would never have been formed as a United Nation.
Move forward to Lincoln's era. t that time there were six political parties. The Republican Party was moving up in power nd stature as the Wig Party was waining. Lincoln always abhorred slavery. The South disliked the prospect of a Lincoln Presidency so much that, once the election results were in, they seceded Immediately.
Lincoln refused to accept that and decided it was essential to maintain the Union. He decide to use military force to prevent the secession nd the South responded by firing the first shots that became the Civil War.
It is true that the War was fought t maintain the Union, but the War would Never have happened if it weren't for the issue of Slavery.
With Slavery, the ideals behind Liberty were false. No American of good conscience could permit the existence of Slavery.
Slavery was the real reason for the Civil War.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous9 years ago
The first shot...
- mark hLv 79 years ago
It had everything to do with slavery in that, if there had been no slaves, there would have been no war.
Obviously there were many complexities, but one is foolish to dismiss the root immorality which built over generations into a grand conflict.
Hope that helps.
- cosmoLv 79 years ago
Ya think? Might have had something to do with that pesky slavery problem that consumed Congress for decades over questions like: "Should new states be slave or free?" and "How many slaves are there, and how much do they count in the census toward political representation?".
- blahhLv 69 years ago
It was over states rights. Slavery was a side issue. And it wasn't because the North cared about the slaves, but they North did not like the 1/5th rule that allowed slaves to count towards government representation.
- ?Lv 59 years ago
An overreaching federal government that was imposing on states rights.
Source(s): Support freedom for Texas. Sign the petition: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peaceful...