Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Obama aid thinks that slavery was ended by Congress. How was it really ended and by whom?
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-aide-the...
I guess this lefty loon aid to the president doesn't know that a Republican, Abraham Lincoln, ended slavery with an executive order, the Emancipation Proclamation smack dab in the middle of the Civil War. Why do these people make these kinds of statements? Don't they know history at all? Who filibustered the Civil Rights Act? The Grand Kleagel and Democrat, Senator Byrd while Republicans by percentage cast the most votes in favor of the Civil Rights Act. And don't give me that crap about the parties switching afterward. Not true.
So what is he saying? Disagreeing with a black president is the same as a vote for slavery? Are people this stupid? Really?
"The Emancipation Proclamation is an executive order issued to the executive agencies of the United States by President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863, during the American Civil War. It was based on the president's constitutional authority as commander in chief of the armed forces; it was not a law passed by Congress. It proclaimed all slaves in Confederate territory to be forever free; that is, it ordered the Army to treat as free men the slaves in ten states that were still in rebellion, thus applying to 3.1 million of the 4 million slaves in the U.S. The Proclamation immediately resulted in the freeing of 50,000 slaves, with nearly all the rest (of the 3.1 million) actively freed as Union armies advanced."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emancipation_Proclama...
The slaves were freed as the Union Army advanced. The Amendment made it officially illegal to own slaves.
16 Answers
- Texas MikeLv 68 years agoFavorite Answer
Probably ... but then again .. is Obama really against slavery?
" Do Welfare Programs Constitute Modern Slavery?"
"You know, if you were a slave in the old South, what did you get as a slave? You got free room and board, you got free money, and you got rewarded for having children because that was just, you know, tomorrow's slave ...
Can I ask a question? How's that different from welfare? You get a free house, you get free food, and you get rewarded for having children. Oh, wait a minute, hold on a second. There is a difference: The slave had to work for it."
It's the dependency factor that joins them at the hip. Slaves were entirely dependent on their white masters for everything. The same holds true with welfare, people become dependent on government to provide for their everyday needs. In effect government becomes their master !
- Weise EnteLv 78 years ago
Well, he's right and you're wrong.
The Emancipation Proclamation only ended slavery in states under revolt. It was still legal in Maryland for example.
It took the 13th Amendment to outlaw slavery, which was passed in both the House and Senate.
Edit:
Read that again.
"It proclaimed all slaves in Confederate territory to be forever free"
There were slave states still in the Union. They weren't freed. The proclamation only reallyfurthered the war effort and was arguably illegal on top of that.
- Anonymous8 years ago
That was a long time ago, and no one alive today is affiliated.
Let's talk about the Battle of the Bulge (1944) where an African American artillery battalion the 333 rd in support of the 106 th Division were overrun in the first hours of the attack. 11 escaped initial capture, and hid with a local family. They were caught by the Germans and marched away.
Their bodies were later found with their jaws broken in by rifle butts, fingers cut off, and stabbed through the eye with bayonets.
Less than a week later around 90 American POW's were machine-gunned near Malmedy, and in Stavelot over 90 Belgian civilians were executed, including 23 children.
How come he's not mad at the Germans?
I'm sure picking cotton for room & board (150 years ago) was so much worse.
- Anonymous8 years ago
You're incorrect - slavery was officially ended by the 13th Amendment.
The Emancipation Proclamation did not officialize anything, and as long as certain areas of the South were not liberated by Union forces, then slavery continued despite the Emancipation Proclamation.
Also, politics back then were different. The Republican Party was the more Liberal party back then.
Please learn to think.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous8 years ago
No, Lincoln did not end slavery alone. He did realize that he needed to pass an anti-slavery amendment to the constitution before the end of the civil war because after the war ended, the southern states would not vote for an anti-slavery amendment after they return to the Union. Presidents cannot enact a constitutional amendment by executive order. Congress and the states have to vote to approve a constitutional amendment. So, sorry to say, you are wrong.
- 8 years ago
The 13th Amendment was absolutely required to end slavery. Otherwise, why did Congress struggle over the amendment? Go see the movie.
- who WAS #1?Lv 78 years ago
Slavery was a long time ago. Can't we just serve our corporate and governmental masters well and maybe win the lottery so we can live in the Big House?
- Anonymous8 years ago
Slavery was ended by the slaves themselves if you look at it. Many slaves had began to escape slavery well before the point that it became abolished. It wasn't up until slave owners petitioned to force all escaped slaves to be returned that congress stepped in