Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Strict gun control has been proven not to work, so why push for it?
http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp#crime
Crime and Self-Defense
* Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States during 2008. Of these, about 10,886 or 67% were committed with firearms.[11]
* A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 0.5% of households had members who had used a gun for defense during a situation in which they thought someone "almost certainly would have been killed" if they "had not used a gun for protection." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 162,000 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard."[12]
* Based on survey data from the U.S. Department of Justice, roughly 5,340,000 violent crimes were committed in the United States during 2008. These include simple/aggravated assaults, robberies, sexual assaults, rapes, and murders.[13] [14] [15] Of these, about 436,000 or 8% were committed by offenders visibly armed with a gun.[16]
* Based on survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology,[17] U.S. civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per year.[18]
* A 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households found that over the previous five years, at least 3.5% of households had members who had used a gun "for self-protection or for the protection of property at home, work, or elsewhere." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 1,029,615 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard."[19]
* A 1994 survey conducted by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that Americans use guns to frighten away intruders who are breaking into their homes about 498,000 times per year.[20]
* A 1982 survey of male felons in 11 state prisons dispersed across the U.S. found:[21]
• 34% had been "scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim"
• 40% had decided not to commit a crime because they "knew or believed that the victim was carrying a gun"
• 69% personally knew other criminals who had been "scared off, shot at, wounded, or captured by an armed victim"[22]
Washington DC. : * During the years in which the D.C. handgun ban and trigger lock law was in effect, the Washington, D.C. murder rate averaged 73% higher than it was at the outset of the law, while the U.S. murder rate averaged 11% lower.[37]
Great Britain: The homicide rate in England and Wales has averaged 52% higher since the outset of the 1968 gun control law and 15% higher since the outset of the 1997 handgun ban.[42]
Chicago: * Since the outset of the Chicago handgun ban, the percentage of Chicago murders committed with handguns has averaged about 40% higher than it was before the law took effect.[55]
Florida: * Since the outset of the Florida right-to-carry law, the Florida murder rate has averaged 36% lower than it was before the law took effect, while the U.S. murder rate has averaged 15% lower.[108]
Texas: * Since the outset of the Texas right-to-carry law, the Texas murder rate has averaged 30% lower than it was before the law took effect, while the U.S. murder rate has averaged 28% lower.[115]
***Please review this page yourself as well. Its a very wonderful piece, with no spin or bias from any author or journalist. Lets stop blaming the guns, and trying to ban them, because that WILL only make things worse. Lets talk armed security guards at our schools, not banning guns in general.
7 Answers
- ObushaLv 48 years agoFavorite Answer
Because it makes people feel safer. Which is probably even more detrimental because now people will think they are safe, and will still get shot up or bombed by insane criminals.
To hell with the Constitution and logic. Guns are scary, guns are evil.
Restrict and then Ban guns.
Because bans worked so well for Alcohol and Drugs...
@Lightning from the West
In many aspects, Canadians actually have better gun laws than America. They can buy NEW machine guns and imported firearms. We can't.
@Baby Spittle
And that would entail a massive bureaucracy which regulates things such as purchasing things that could be potentially used to make guns. Not to mention the guns that would be smuggled in, the guns that would be hand made.
Also, I'm fairly certain that the rate in which people were poisoned or bombed would go up...
- 8 years ago
Because people don't understand that stricter gun laws don't necessarily mean it will be harder for criminals to get guns. Also, most people haven't researched stats from places where bans were passed and gun crime went up. It's just assumed that stricter laws mean less people with guns so less gun-related crime. It is a knee-jerk reaction that happens every time there is a newsworthy crime committed with a gun.
Even if we put a complete ban on guns in this country, people would still find a way to obtain them. Drugs are illegal but people seem to still be using those...
- 5 years ago
Agree. What these F*ck headed liberal poosy tree hugging hippy anti-american socialist anti-gun scumbags do not understand is that "If we outlaw guns then handiest outlaws could have weapons." it doesn't matter what the Fawk you do, criminals will invariably have weapons, they don't obey gun laws. If you are anti-gun then in my e-book you're a crook in the second measure with the aid of trying to lessen the ratio of gun proudly owning with citizens vs criminals. For every gun owned by means of a criminal 5 should be legally owned by means of a responsibly armed citizen. Some men and women say that considering the fact that Japan is so anti-gun and have the lowest crime fee implies that signifies that gun=dangerous. However to prove that you would must compare a pro-gun Japan to an anti-gun Japan. Dumbarses. Lately, gun legal guidelines in Texas became more lax. While crime charges dropped. Twist of fate? No.
- ?Lv 58 years ago
The alternative which some people seem to think is a great idea it to just have all citizens carry guns, since the more guns in the community the safer they will be. [sarcasm]
Personally I don't think I'd feel safer walking in the streets with everybody armed. Next thing you know, you'll have vigilates patrolling the streets, stalking young black men, provoking fights and then shooting them with a claim of self-defense.
- Weise EnteLv 78 years ago
They haven't. It's a simple fact that every country with stricter gun laws has less shootings.
In reality, the drop in most places coincides perfectly with the national drop in violent crime. Chicago has had an increase in gang violence, and is an outlier. No one who actually understands the situation thinks a gun law has a damn thing to do with it.
- Anonymous8 years ago
pure and simple bullsh*t.
If its difficult to impossible to get a gun, gun deaths will be reduced - you fuking tool