Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
About America's gun control dispute?
Lets just say hypothetically the UN and America's government go and take away all of the American citizens weapons. Let's say a few events occur following the disarming of American citizen's that cause widespread uproar in America eventually leading to some sort of cival war.
How would that affect Canada? Will Canada soon disarm all of their citizens too? Dont you think police and security presence in dense exposed areas such as malls and schools should be enhanced instead of taking everybody's weapons away? sorry for asking about Canada in american answers but more americans answer lol. thank you for your time and opinions.
8 Answers
- impaler19120Lv 78 years agoFavorite Answer
Whoa!!
What is the UN doing that has any influence on the United States? For well over 60 years we have financially supported the UN. which has been totally useless since day one. They have nothing to say about what happens on the US. The US is a free country, and determines its own destiny.
I agree with my fellow Navy vet who told you that the revolution would start the instant someone tried to take away the guns. I fought a war for this country, and I believe in its Constitution, including the Second Amendment.
- CG-23 SailorLv 68 years ago
There is a small mistake in your hypothetical.
"Let's say a few events occur following the disarming of American citizen's that cause widespread uproar in America eventually leading to some sort of cival war."
The Attempted Disarming of the American citizens WOULD be the cause of the next Civil war. You would not need some "situation following the disarmament" the attempted disarmament itself would be the cause.
As for Canada.
Canada has but two choices.
Assist the America CITZENS.. Or stay the F*** out of our way.
Source(s): USN Vet - Anonymous8 years ago
Canada already disarmed their citizens,. They are afraid of guns. That is why the only people with guns are American gang bangers who come over from Detroit and Buffalo.
And what is this stuff about the UN doing anything in the US. They don't have any say in this country at all. They are a bunch of leaches that have lived off the US money since WWII. Of course we had to win WWII to keep all of you fools free.
By the way, don't fool yourself into thinking that the US likes Canada. You are just a convenient buffer between us and the former Soviet Union.
- ?Lv 45 years ago
The founding fathers had very certain ideas: If the persons did no longer have get properly of entry to to guns, the authorities might want to easily run roughshod over them a twin of it did in all the examples contained in the video. Firearms are an fantastic deterrent to gross abuses of governmental potential. that doesn't advise that each body must have guns; the criminally violent, the mentally sick, etc. should not be in a position to stroll in a convenience keep and purchase an AK-40 seven. this is the rationalization for historic past tests and prepared sessions. There should not be regulations on the rights of straightforward electorate to own firearms for his or her own safe practices, for looking, and as a deterrent to ability governmental abuses. only because someone favors gun administration doesn't make him a democrat and someone who opposes it isn't unavoidably a republican. right here in Georgia, maximum persons were democrats until eventually the democratic governor determined that it became time to eliminate the accomplice image from our state flag. very few human beings commonly used gun administration. We elected Perdue because the first republican governer because the civil conflict after he suggested he may keep the flag as-is. we are now republicans, and we nonetheless do not want gun administration. I stay in a rural section. I used my pistol to kill a rattlesnake in my backyard some weeks in the past, and that i had it in my hand at the same time as someone walked into my backyard carrying a large gas can at 2 AM some nights in the past, of direction with the rationalization for stealing the gas out of my dump truck. "Get out of my backyard! NOW!" is only much better effective once you've the means to back up the words. Firearms make an fantastic deterrent to crime and are functional in rural parts the position bears, wolves, rattlesnakes, etc. would pose a chance to safe practices. The a techniques-a techniques-left wing of the Democratic party has needed to eliminate our guns for decades. besides the undeniable fact that, they are seldom the persons who're elected to workplace, only because it turned right into a fluke that George Bush, a a techniques-a techniques-properly Republican grew to grow to be President. extremely many times, moderates from both party, who carry better mainstream perspectives on maximum topics, are certainly elected. The NRA has tens of millions of people; neither party extremely needs to make us mad.
- garrytooLv 78 years ago
The UN has no power in the USA and guns are not going to be taken away from their citizens. So get that out of your mind.
- ?Lv 68 years ago
America will never outlaw firearms, The Constitution (Bill of Rights) states we can keep and bear arms, the idea is so the Government doesn't have the only weapons.
- nick i need helpLv 48 years ago
They will have to pry my guns from my cold dead hands.
Source(s): USA GUN OWNER