If I can't own a AK-47, you shouldn't own a Ferrari.?

this is the most logical statement ive ever heard a hick make. sorry about Obama winning. hmmm, i bet u want Alabaa to beat notre dame right. cupcakes and breadboxes

Chew, I would much rather make that decision then you or the fning government,

By the way I have Zr1 650 Hp,Corvette.

Its counter part the Shelby Mustang Cobra At 550 Hp.

They never go faster then the Marathon Motor Coach goes that I pull them with,

There toys and there fun.

Have gone through the Speed School at Daytona Motor Speedway.

I am much more concerned about people driving motor coaches that have

no clue of what they are doing then fly. Then someone driving a fast car,

If you want to champion a cause, Petition your state DMV to make those

buying such units pass a drivers test to do the same. It would be a hell of

a lot safer out there.

Ive also heard that.. "if a drunk driver creates car crashed because of their misuse of the vehicle, shouldnt mine be taken away?" something like that towards gun control. But your totally right in your statement

not as balanced as a comparison as you may think. while fast cars are dangerous...they are not as easy, concealable, and convenient as an AK is. if people want to kill people they would pick up the gun...not their ferrari. understand my point? one of the purposes behind the creation of the gun is to shoot and kill. a fast car is for racing, not killing.

yes, both are dangerous but both have different uses and purposes.

This is why there should be some sort of intelligence test for prospective gun owners. Missing logic.

If you follow this logic, then I should about to own some WMDs.

a AK47 is a lot cheaper