If the liberals do get their anti gun agendas passed?

As the left tries to shame Americans into surrendering the 2nd Amendment, by shamelessly exploiting the innocent dead. One thing has been announced in Venezuela. That Putin and Chavez have decided to build not just one but TWO AK47/74 plants in Chavez's dictatorship.

Does ANYONE think these two new plants will strictly be limited to pumping out semi auto clones for the USA civilian market??? Or, are they to help grow the arms of the South American dictatorship of Chavez? Perhaps even helping arm an invasion of a stripped populace and depleted Army of the USA??

Mention has been made of removing a civilian's right to do a face to face gun purchase. With no FFL dealer involved. How they could possibly achieve some of their goals and ideas? Without a vast and profitable snitch system? Is unknown. Because, if I which to sell an arm to someone. I'll do it. FFL check be damned.

Which is the very key to the black market. No one giving a damn what the government imposes upon us. The burden is in the obeying anymore. The burden use to be that it was hard and offensive to disobey. These days? There are too many rules, too many regs and FAR too few honest people to enforce. The system rife with corruption and favoritism

Perhaps the very idea IS to drive things into the black market? Being our government is so riddled with the corrupt. The greater profit IS the black market. Deal direct in arms and ammo with the gangs our government seems to support.. No middle man like an honest FFL dealer..You want an arm or a drug? Go to the local gang dealer. He pays the government their "cut" directly.

You need to educate yourself on the issue. For starters, the guns that are coming across the border from Mexico are being purchased originally in gun stores in places like Arizona. Did you know that? That's because the laws there are so ridiculously lax. Of course there is always going to be a black market. No one is denying that, not even Feinstein. The goal is to reduce the number of guns in circulation as much as possible, making them harder to get. You talk about others being oblivious to the facts when it is clear that you haven't put much thought into the issue.

There's already a black market for guns. Half a million are stolen from law-abiding citizens every year and end up in the hand of criminals.

If anything, restricted ownership of guns cripples the black market for them. Law-abiding citizens supply the whole thing.

Plus, guns go from the US to Mexico, not the other way around.

Don't look at it as an 'Anti Gun Agenda', look at it as a 'Innocent Child Protection Agenda'. Whatever screwed up assessment of gun crime in the UK or else where you want to give in arguement that's completely irrelevant. The 'liberals' aren't doing it because they want to deprive you of your favourite toy, don't look at it so selfishly, they're doing it WITH THE INTENTION, let me say again INTENTION, that changing gun laws will protect innocents. INTENTION. You must at least hear the other side of the arguement, and you cannot demonise someone for suggesting it. You certainly cannot moralise your own position in the wake of another massacre. RIP kids, it looks like you're already forgotten in this arguement.

I predict arms will begin flowing in from the Middle East and old Soviet bloc countries.

Criminals and determined patriots and lovers of freedom will be a great market.

"Liberals" are not going to pass any anti guns agendas. The Democarts in Congress could try to make stricter gun laws, but they will not pass.

Gun control is not one of my liberal views nor am I a Democrat.

We need to do something about guns, yes people will find a way to get guns here to the U.S., but we can't stand by and do nothing as we have done in the past.

Therefore legalize atomic weapons for individuals? Why must Good always have to wait for Perfect?

Pot's illegal and every third car in traffic has an ash tray full of it.

You really know how to whine about nothing.