When liberals say "I'm too poor to vote republican" don't they really mean?

I've never heard not one Liberal make this statement.

Enough said.

The undesirable easily at the prompt are not undesirable, they basically have significantly decreased pay charges. stocks suck up each of the earnings of a organization. some thing is going to some few up precise. If there have been a real trickle down effect or bonus tests that were shared with workers really of the wealth blood suckers. definite they're blood suckers, those who do not artwork and shave income off of my labor. Worse than welfare people. So if someone calls you undesirable reason you're making 30k a 12 months tell them i in my view make 90k a 12 months they basically have not despatched the a reimbursement too me yet. Whats next commence procuring up position of abode homes as a fashion to overcharge me employ to line there wallet too, will it ever end. possibly they could purchase up the water organizations and value me 50$ to take a bath.

No. One cannot realistically lump all non-Republicans into a big 'lazy' category. One cannot lump all the 'working poor' in this nation (a growing group of people) as lazy in any sense of the word.

One can, however, define applicable terms & position statements of the Republican Party as having a beneficial slant toward the monied classes more than the average working person.

IMO, both major parties are largely corrupted by $$, both private & corporate, and are not as much anti-average-joe than pro-corporate profits.

No liberal ever claimed to be "too poor to vote republican". You're making that up. Your team lost the election, and America won.

I have never heard that, and I am an active person who has a lot of contact with a lot of people, from the not-so-well off to millionaires.

I wish I had enough points to like some of the answers already posted.

Thumbs up to these three people's answers:

:: Welcome to America now go home

:: ?

:: cray paragraphs 1 and 3 (not really agreeing with the second paragraph)

I am Republican and husband and I are eligible for food stamps based on hubby's middle-of-the-road Social Security income plus $129/mo pension (I am too young to collect anything). My unemployment ran out 13 months ago. Our low income puts us below the poverty line.

I do not accept government assistance because we do not need food stamps to help us buy groceries because I am able to pay our bills and continue our lifestyle on the low income by watching our discretionary spending.

I, hubby, parents, son, grandparents, brothers and their signif others were all raised as Democrats but we are all card-carrying Republicans because, among other issues, we are against abortion in any circumstance and we believe the government needs to be fiscally responsible and SMALLER. We all hate paying taxes because of abuse of entitlement programs like housing assistance and food stamps paid out month after month and year after year after year without end to millions of people, the volume of Social Security disability paid to people able to work, etc., etc., etc. We do not disagree with Social Security and Medicare benefits for people who collect based on age attained (not perceived disabilities) because workers pay into it, expecting to receive benefits when age eligible.

Thanks for listening.

Yes the poor are lazy yes

I can't afford to vote for Liberals, I work for a living and would like to retire while I'm young enough to enjoy it.

That's not what we say. We say. "I'm too smart to vote republican."

What bothered me was all the liberal media's whining about Romney's millions

yet eight years earlier none of those media commented on John Kerry's wealth

Or the fact that Romney earned his wealth, but Kerry Married it.

LMAO !! Yeah, that's it... Its simply easer, to pull that lever, on the left side of that machine... To much of a strain, pulling the right side one...

No, we mean poor. If you don't make 250,000 or more a year and you vote republican, you are just plain stupid.