Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
8 Answers
- 8 years agoFavorite Answer
Our forefathers created the 2nd amendment so it's people can maintain and protect their freedoms from threats foreign or DOMESTIC.
Source(s): The United States Constitutuion. 10 USC Chapter 13 http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/10C13.txt - BflowingLv 78 years ago
No, of course not. It was never meant for people to form private armies because they don't like the government. No sane statesman would have ever agree to such.
It has been expanded in meaning to cover individual rights and protection (although not against the government), but it is not an absolute right. Weapons defined as dangerous or unusual can still be controlled by Congress or the States.
- Anonymous8 years ago
Yes, it was, since back at the time it was written a musket that took a minute to reload was the most powerful type of weapon. But now that there's biological weapons, tanks, missiles, and rocket launchers, I doubt a little handgun will do much against an unjust government.
- Uncle PennybagsLv 78 years ago
Close. The purpose is that we Americans could own guns so we could preserve our freedoms.
That may be from an unjust gov't, or it could be from a foreign invader or some other scenario.
- Anonymous8 years ago
Unjust? It depends on your definition of unjust. Tyrannical? Definitley.
- 8 years ago
Wasnt the whole constitution written by rich governmental men for rich governmental men?