SaggiMC, trolling like a sir or not?

i said exactly the same things about that person before. there's just no insight in her answers. just basic astrology and links and how astro.com better than other website and well, she (?) just keep repeating the same things, just like chainbullsh1tting repeat same quotes from sagan and whoever.

if she is not a bot, she is exactly the kind of people i hate. didactic with teacher complex, an impersonal repeater of obviousness with no character. she just should go fk herself instead of robotically devote herself to such a sh1tty cause (i bet she thinks she is doing a good job) anyone who has enough brains to understand what she says should also be able to google the sh1t and find the general astrologic facts there.

here, people ask other people personal questions. they expect your insight. this is not freaking wikipedia.

but you want higher ranks?

1. answer questions with no answers (vote for yourself then)

2. answer all uninteresting questions answered by trolls only.

3. have no life - 4140 best answers (how many freaking total answers by the gods of robotic madness?) in such a short time? real pathetic if you think about it.

It's not any more surprising than Chain being at number 3. o.O

Most of it is copy-pasted, true, there are occasional bits that are very useful though, which is usually one sentence or so.

However, even though she claims she's a modern astrologer, she told me my Jupiter in Pisces in the 12th CANNOT be the strongest planet in the chart, according to traditional astrology, because it's in the 12th (basically the worst place to be). I checked the Almuten of the chart with a certain software a couple of weeks later and it turned out it's not Jupiter indeed. So even though she's not a traditionalist, she was able to answer my question from such a perspective which is something I cannot say about a lot of the moderns here. If you want to be really knowledgeable in a certain sphere, you HAVE to be aware there is more than one perspective to it (it's true in every science). She even directed me to skyscript and I had forgotten there was a lot of info on traditional astrology there so I read a few quite interesting articles there. So in short she did push me forward relative to my current knowledge which is something a lot of the other members have been incapable of doing.

No. They probably just have autism or something. I don't know, but they used to be a member on Astrology Weekly... I think. When I posted a thread on there a while back I got the same type of response with hundreds of links.

I find it quite condescending really -- assuming** we don't know anything about astrology, so instead are given the links to the fundamental basics of it all, rather than actually having our question answered. Nuns aren't stupid. Amen.

Yes! Oh my god, I'm so glad I'm not the only one who gets so frustrated when that piece of sh!t answers one of my questions.

I don't know if it's a bot but I'm so sick of it. It needs to stop. We all need to get it off Yahoo answers!

There are computer bots that troll people?

Anyone that claims to be an "expert" I avoid. If you truly are an expert your answers speak for themselves and you don't need to boast about it.