Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Were the Roman ancestors of Romanians mostly from Italy or all around the empire?

I know Romanians descend in part from Roman citizens, mainly legionnaires and colonists who brought Latin with them providing the foundation of the Romanian language, but I've read conflicting accounts of where the settlers came from. Were they mostly from various provinces from around the empire or primarily from Italy?

By the time the 2nd century rolled around, the Roman Empire was very cosmopolitan, however by the same token, wasn't citizenship still restricted mainly to Italians or to families of Italic origin living in the provinces? I know that Emperor Trajan's plan (the conqueror of Dacia, modern Romania) was to thoroughly Romanize Dacia on account of its remote location as a frontier province, hence his decision to heavily populate the province with Roman citizens.

Another reason I ask is that quite a few Romanians I've seen look very much like Italians. I'm wondering if it's merely due to the fact that the Roman colonists would've at least been drawn from Southern Europe even if not Italy itself, or if it's because there is a more direct connection.

Update:

@Iulica: Thanks for the answer. I also personally think that regardless of the Roman colonists' actual ethnic origins, there's definitely a link between them and the modern Romanians. Most accounts I've read tend to state that they intermarried with and assimilated many of the indigenous Dacians, forming a "Daco-Roman" population that spoke a dialect of Latin (or proto-Romanian if you will). The question is how numerous were the colonists relative to the native Dacians. Some think that most of the Dacians (at least the men) were killed off or sold into slavery whereas others state that the population remained mostly native Dacian with only a modest number of Roman colonists settling in the province (and that the Dacians therefore adopted Latin at some point).

I know Romanians also later on absorbed many of the migrating people that passed through and to an extent settled their territory, especially Slavs, but I also believe that Romanians have less Slavic,

1 Answer

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    The romans that have been brought to the Dacia province where most likely from all over the empire. The Dacia province was a border one, underdeveloped, so it's hard to belive that the 100% romans (from Italy) wanted to quit their luxurios life style and move into this area of the world. It is possible though that some of the soldiers remained and "mingled" with the local population.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.