Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Nikon 24-70 f/2.8... Discuss...?
Pros? Cons? Alternative choices? Will they bring out a VR version?
I have used the 17-55 on my DX cameras for years, but it was the first lens I bought.
Now, I have the 28-300 as well as the 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 VR. Should I spend the money???
I was thinking I'd sell the 24-85, but there is such an excess on the market after Nikon gave so many away, that they barely sell for $300 right now. It's not worth getting rid of a decent lens for that little. I mean, it's supposed to sell for $600, but even brand new in the box copies are not getting $300-325 sales.
2 Answers
- ?Lv 78 years agoFavorite Answer
The April 2013 issue of Shutterbug has a review of the new Tamron SP 24-70mm f2.8 Di VC USD zoom lens. In my opinion you should read it before making a buying decision.With VC (Vibration Conpensation) it offers what the comparable Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 and Canon 24-70mm f2.8 both lack - stabilization.
Here is an earlier review: http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/02/06/tamron24-7...
I'm guessing you'll sell your 24-85 even though the Tamron is 15mm shorter.
- Anonymous8 years ago
It really depends on the type of shooting you do. This is a great lens in combination with the 70-200 f2.8 for wedding photography. It is a relatively expensive lens, but produces great results, and will give you the capability of shooting in lower light situations. So it really depends, if you have a use for it go for it. If you need fast glass and super sharp pictures, you will not be disappointed.
Best wishes