Luis Suarez 10 Match Ban?

Why are you telling Liverpool to appeal it..?

I Doubt they'll see this question.

I expected at least 6 but 10 is clearly a warning to others about violent play AND takes into account the fact Suarez has 'previous' for the same offence and obviously hasn't learnt his lesson.

I expect Liverpool to appeal against the length of the ban (which will presumably be suspended pending the appeal) so that he's available until the end of this season - and then put him on the transfer list.

Which is what I suspect will suit the diving little cheat down to the ground.

Pushing a ref over is worse because it's disrespecting authority. What Suarez did was pretty bad, but he only nibbled him and didn't do lasting damage. 5/6 games would've been fair.

Hard to tell though because the FA are not consistent at all. They gave Roy Keane a 5 match ban for ending the career of Alf-Inge Haaland, yet rarely punish any leg breakers post match, such as Shawcross on Ramsey

Banned for a year and wages frozen for few months what Suarez done was assault on the streets this would get the normal person about 8 months also think if so one bit down that hard on your skin this could lead to infections diseases and only for ivanovic pushing Suarez away he would have probably tore a lump of flesh btw anyone justifies or condones this well...

10 matches is good he keeps on doing stuff next time it will be a 12 match ban then 15 then 18 then 20

Well he did something that he should not do, but it is too harsh to give him 10 match ban, is it because FA dislike suarez and they do not want suarez to win it.

If Liverpool were managed properly this wouldn't have happened. Obviously Suarez holds the blame but when you have a 'loose cannon' on board you tie it down to stop it doing any damage or throw it overboard.

Give him a break. He was hungry. Nothing that a Snickers bar before a match won't cure.

maybe 6 matches

disgrace tho

He is lucky he still is allowed to play in England.