Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
would u be pleased if Podolski starts as the CF for arsenal against Wigan?
will u give him another chance to prove his worth??
or not....??
or a winger??
5 Answers
- Anonymous8 years agoFavorite Answer
Nah, his movement is not suited for being a lone striker, I believe he'd make an excellent second striker... mainly because he played there most of his early career excellently. But Arsenal don't play with a second striker, more a creative number 10 like Wilshere, Cazorla or Rosicky, with two wide players either side of a lone striker.
I believe Podolski should play wide left, with Walcott through the middle, Oxlade-Chamberlain wide right and Cazorla in the number 10 role. I believe Ox deserves a chance. As for Wilshere, I don't think he should start either of our two remaining games, maybe late sub appearances, keep him fresh for next year.
Out of wide left and cf I believe Poldi is more effective wide left, but in terms of his best position SS would be his best. Like in the Bergkamp role.
- Anonymous8 years ago
Well after seeing his perfomance he gave against QPR, then id say no as he gives minimal contribution. Hes probably the best finisher, but other than that, theres no excuse for him to play there. Id like to see walcott play there as i feel he exells there. He plays a lot better than than RW. I wouldnt mind seeing cazorla there, but at this stage, its too risky. But i see wenger playing podolski in CF because wenger recently said he dosent want to play walcott in the centre.
Source(s): Arsenal fan - How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.