Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

was dame Helen Mirren justified in her actions towards the protesters who were banging drums?

basically there was a recent show at a theatre where actress dame Helen Mirren was portraying the role as the queen while outside there was a protest of drummers making a lot of noise which disrupted the performance, so she went outside furious telling the crowd to move.

was she justified in her actions, opinions and thoughts please.

Update:

also do you think being famous gives you a certain power of the normal folks in society and the law?

Update 2:

some very good points made.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    She could have not have been more justified. People whose only intention is to come to where you are working and trying to make a living, and be disruptive should be removed from society. If they want to protest, go protest where the problem is, not at the theater.

    It doesn't matter who was performing. What matters is that it's not their forum. Carrying a protest sign doesn't give a person the right to act like a jerk.

  • 4 years ago

    Wow, that's disappointing. for sure she's incorrect. Sane men are quite able to controlling their sexual urges. in the experience that they could't they should be in a psychological corporation. i have had a guy no longer been waiting to get it up because he's been too inebriated before. i became waiting for sex. ought to I actually have taken my frustration out on him? perhaps shoved an merchandise or 2 up his anus (antagonistic to his will)? a lady (and a guy) has the full good to decline at any factor, even even as they're actual having sex. If the guy is hurting the girl, ought to he be allowed to proceed to reason her actual soreness for even if lengthy he needs to? it appears that evidently we've some rapist sympathisers (and/or ability/actually rapists) in our midst - yet then we knew that already. Now all of us comprehend why there is in reality a 5% or 6% conviction fee - and it has no longer something to do with pretend accusations. element - I thoroughly agree.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Yes indeed - protesters are vain and childish - people paid to hear helen

  • 6 years ago

    yes

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.