Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

When does the public's right to know outweigh a minor's right to privacy?

It is not uncommon to read that the authorities are withholding the identity of a minor accused of a crime. In the case of 8 year old Leila Fowler - allegedly murdered by her 12 year-old step-brother, the Calaveras County Sheriff's department held a press conference. Although he is innocent until proved guilty in the justice system, the court of public opinion is a different matter.

So my question is: How do law enforcement officials decide when to protect the identity of a minor charged with a crime?

Update:

@Kenneth: His identity was released by the sheriff at a press conference. He wasn't named - but "the victim's 12 year old step-brother" is not any kind of anonymity.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    If the minor's name became public, it was likely approved by the parents. Some do that.

  • 8 years ago

    The sheriff is likely prohibited by law from revealing the minor's identity. Undoubtedly, everyone in the town, including every reporter in Calaveras County, knows the name of the suspect. The media is constitutinoally permitted to report the minor's name. However, most media companies have a policy where they decline to publicize the names of minors accused of crimes.

  • 8 years ago

    All minors involved in a crime have their identities kept confidential. There is no decision that needs to be made.

  • 8 years ago

    it all depends if the minor is certified to stand trial as an adult.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.