Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Does Obama really believe that " more security " would have stopped the Benghazi Terrorist Attack...?

Who is President Obama kidding ?.....

Does Obama really expect anyone to believe that " more security " would have prevented or stopped the deadly Muslim Terrorist Attack and implemented a rescue mission for the Benghazi Americans ?

If President Obama really wanted to rescue the Benghazi Americans , why did he fail to order that US military rescue/defense mission be deployed immediately during the hours that the deadly Muslim Attack was occurring ?

Update:

Is Obama really foolish enough to believe that " more security guards " would have quelled a deadly hours Muslim Attack that lasted for hours ?

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    He was resting so he could go to Vegas on a campaign stop and didn't care how many Americans died so long as they were not members of his Muslim Brotherhood.

    Source(s): 想改善經痛C~
  • savitz
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Between 2007 and 2008 Obama promised 1) A transparent WH, 2) shut Guantanamo, 3) reduce the deficit in half of, four) inexpensive health care, all of that have been lies. He included up the Benghazi attacks via falsely claiming it was bcuz of a video, verified to be a lie. So your in prefer of a steady liar versus anybody who wants proper democracy?

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    More security "might" have prevented the attack. Because nobody attacks without scouting the place out. If sufficient security was provided, they might not have tried it.

    At the very least, they could have defended themselves

    For the first time in 5 years, I'll let a die-hard left wing liberal speak for me on this. The incompetence was before the attack, and during.

    Maureen Dowd

    New York Times

    The administration’s behavior before and during the attack in Benghazi, in which four Americans died, was unworthy of the greatest power on earth.

    President Obama knew he was sending diplomats and their protectors into a country that was no longer a country, a land rife with fighters affiliated with Al Qaeda.

    Yet in this hottest of hot spots, the State Department’s minimum security requirements were not met, requests for more security were rejected, and contingency plans were not drawn up, despite the portentous date of 9/11 and cascading warnings from the C.I.A

    The defense secretary at the time, Leon Panetta, insisted, “We quickly responded.” But they responded that they would not respond.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/12/opinion/sunday/d...

  • 8 years ago

    Who's responsibility is it that says whether they get more security or not.

    It's always has been the Executive Branch of the US Government. That's Obama isn't it! So isn't he 'responsible' for the lack of security there.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    What terrorist attack?

    Are you talking about the spontaneous protest of the youtube video no one ever saw

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    The only thing Obama believes in is himself. Screw the rest of the country.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    You mean like bush stopper 9/11?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.