How do you not win with three "superstars" in the team?

Don't ever insult Micheal Jordan like that. Two, Chris Bosh is NOT a superstar. He is too inconsistent and is not even kind of clutch. The Miami Heat have NO inside presence. Bosh cannot defend Tim Duncan if Duncan had the flu. The San Antonio Spurs are one of the best defensive teams in the league. Erik Spoelstra is not all that great a coach. Gregg Popovich is one of the best coaches in the league. The Heat, besides the "big 3", have a bunch of 3-point shooters who hit OPEN 3's. Any decent shooter can hit an OPEN three. The only one of their long-range shooters who can put the ball on the floor and get himself open for three is Ray Allen. The rest of them are catch and shoot players.

Jordan is a better player than Lebron, but it has nothing to do with championships. Championships are a horrible way to compare players. They're compared because they're both dominant players, and the best of their respective generations. Championships are won as a team: players, coaches, trainers, etc.

Teams with three superstars haven't had a good track record (at least over the past 20 years)

Barkley, Drexler, and Olajuwon failed

Barkley, Pippen, and Olajuwon failed

Shaq, Bryant, and Malone failed

Durant, Harden, and Westbrook failed

Garnett, Pierce, and Allen won once in 4 tries

Wade, James, and Bosh have won once in 2 tries (excluding this season since the finals aren't over)

Lebron is better than Michael. Lebron has years to come he is already averaging the same and better than mj. The ring don't matter. Lebron will get plenty more to come. He's also easily going to pass mj in MVP trophies. Kobe isn't even in the conversation either. Scotty also said Lebron would beat mj in one on one and is better. It's all common sense.

We have to establish that LeBron isn't even better than Bird yet.