Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
would a norman rockwell print be on a heavy board?
I found a Norman Rockwell in an old 1/2 inch frame,it looks painted on a heavy board.1/8 thick.Is it real?
3 Answers
- ChessplayerLv 58 years agoFavorite Answer
Rockwell painted in oils on canvas. He took preliminary photographs, and made watercolor and acrylic sketches as the basis for paintings. I am not aware that he painted on hardboard panels, but it's possible. Your picture could also be a copy, created commercially by some color reproduction process onto something thicker than paper. Many of these reproductions have a textured surface to give a more realistic impression. You don't mention the age of the item; today's printing firms can reproduce color prints on just about any material: photographic paper, canvas, even metal.
If you find the same picture cataloged with his paintings then you have a copy. If you can remove the picture from the frame, the edge of the material should reveal whether it's a primed hardboard or a lamination of cardboard material. To be absolutely certain, you'll need to contact a fine arts appraiser.
Source(s): fine arts painter for 40 years - 5 years ago
As one other answer mentioned, it is dependent upon where you acquired it, however I disagree with the other answer's analysis. For those who purchased the wallpaper from a commercially authentic web site, you on the whole obtained a license. Which you could assess the phrases of use on their web site to see if they speak about it. If they do not speak about it, you generally bought a single copy -- this means that you can't make any more copies of it (similar to to move it to an additional pc). That is an atypical outcomes, which is why I believe it is going to normally be blanketed within the site's phrases of use. The inquiry does not strictly end there. If the website you got the picture from didn't clearly have a license to promote you a duplicate or license of the picture, then you're an "harmless infringer" -- still in violation of copyright, however any individual that the majority copyright house owners do not chase. If you happen to quite simply saved to your tough pressure an snapshot you obtained off any person's site, you're often an infringer, although they had the right to position it on their internet site. For those who scanned an picture, you're absolutely an infringer. Some men and women may just talk about "reasonable use" in that situation, but it without doubt shouldn't be.
- Anonymous8 years ago
Odds are- probably not. Still, its worth a try to either link photos to your question or have it professionally appraised.