Inspired by madmax questoin , Is Australia haunted by DRS ?

DRS needs drastic changes and the best option is to make it 'umpire' driven to clear his own doubts through technology rather than player challenging umpire decision.

1

Good, Champ, if this occurred against India I feel they'd elevate a giant hullabaloo about how the DRS is dangerous and flawed and blah blah blah and that it isn't used - and this hypothetical difficulty can be quite counterproductive for cricket. In view that you see DRS isn't the drawback. The howlers given by way of the on-discipline umpires show the fact that DRS is critical. It can be the application of DRS that is the crisis, and that needs to be addressed immediately. EDIT: @ TJ - however the DRS and the technological know-how itself is pleasant as far as eradicating howlers go. It is the umpires who're complicating the limitation with the aid of not implementing the DRS appropriately. The science has given sufficient proof to "supply" the "proper" determination and overturn the original one, however the umpire failed to take action. The error here is human error on the umpire's section in no longer making use of DRS properly, no longer DRS itself. I'm quite baffled as to why this is happening so normally on this Ashes sequence, given that I quite have now not seen such terrible utility of the DRS earlier than, and that's pronouncing whatever considering the fact that England frequently use the DRS in all its series (apart from vs India) - so possibly it is this current set of officiating umpires who're without difficulty no longer skilled ample with the DRS?!

DRS has been poorly applied to both sides this northern summer. The poms have made better use of the system though, so full credit for that.

The last decision against Khwaja was simply absurd though. The ICC has to implement some common sense changes, or lose all credibility.

It was a case of poor application of the DRS.

remember the original decision was out, so clearly the use of DRS itself is justified, it's such a shame that the umpire didn't overturn the decision which would have been a great example of the DRS is effective

No I don't think so, but the 3rd umpire is definitely blind in one eye and cannot see out of the other one.

It's not drs at fault, it's the umpires.

No.just by the third umpires decisions.

If im not getting wrong, you are madmax..right..? -_-

then you inspired by yourself..you mean..grr

coming back to your Qn..

pata ni..kya DRS..grr duh