Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why do people think God isn't in charge?

Everybody tells me that decision makers in the mental health services are in charge of me. And I know that's not true, and all they've got is concept with nothing in it "mental health" reserved for themselves, so if I'm not in charge of me, then God must be on the other side of that hole and in charge of me instead, and that must apply to everyone, otherwise the people with the hole in reality just for themselves would be in charge of everyone and that's what the law says and they keep attempting to alter people so they must be some of the most dissatisfied and negative people in the world, so it can't be them that's in charge and if it's not us that's in charge of ourselves then it must be God that's in charge of everyone instead, because Gods is the only one that agrees with me that the people with the empty concept aren't in charge of anyone at all. And that another empty concept that's for everyone called "super mental health" is for everyone as long as they don't attempt to forcibly alter anyone else against their wishes, and they don't even need that really, if they let God be in charge or are in charge of themselves unless and until they find out that God is in charge instead.

God has given us the gift of "super mental health", a shareable empty concept, that is much better than the other special reserve concept "mental health", so God must be there and must be in charge. But God's not fussy and is very patient, so God indicates that anyone can have it anyway, even the people who currently force harmful things on people that they don't want, if they change their ways, otherwise they've got "super mental illness" instead, and require intensive "treatment" of having appropriate boundaries set to stop them doing that.

And all that is right, so God must be in charge. Otherwise I wouldn't know. And everyone else would have to be right that everyone is wrong and needs to be altered except for the people with the empty concept who don't get altered themselves. And there wouldn't be anyone left soon if that was true because any left would all be trying to alter each other more and more until there weren't any left.

So God must be in charge. Otherwise I would be wrong as well as everyone else, except the people who want to alter everyone to make everyone wrong and agree to alter everyone. God is the only one that agrees with me and I'm right, so God must be in charge of me and in charge of everyone for everyone. For the survival of humanity of nothing else. Then again there is the rest of creation to be going on with so it wouldn't matter too much if there were no humans left, and the humans decided that's what they wanted for themselves and went against God, who would prefer that they did survive for a while longer, rather than getting more and more aggressive altering each other to be more and more altering and agressive until there were none left.

Update:

"Medical" analytical critical negative world view (empty concept for themselves) and negative made up concept and harmful drugs forced for everyone else. For people who know that it's all one and are one with themselves and one with the world. (So nothing wrong to begin with, apart from a subtle hidden mystery within that almost anyone else would regard as an external problem with other people.) Nothing to do with caring at all. Extreme harmful control hierarchy braking down and damaging and breaking people up. No negativity or anything critical in care especially where minds are concerned. "Oh dear." At least I don't cirticise, rant and enforce with harmful drugs.

Update 2:

"Medical" analytical critical negative world view (empty concept for themselves) and negative made up concept and harmful drugs forced for everyone else. For people who know that it's all one and are one with themselves and one with the world. (So nothing wrong to begin with, apart from a subtle hidden mystery within that almost anyone else would regard as an external problem with other people.) Nothing to do with caring at all. Extreme harmful control hierarchy braking down and damaging and breaking people up. No negativity or anything critical in care especially where minds are concerned. "Oh dear." At least I don't cirticise, rant and enforce with harmful drugs.

Update 3:

And they aren't helping anyone. They are harming everyone. And have no idea what they are doing and know nothing about their own minds, let alone anyone else's. So it's no point claiming superiority for a competitive control hierarchy based on a concept with nothing in it that's hell bent on destroying if everything worthwhile in humanity as quickly as possible. Unless you agree that there's something wrong with everyone unless all they've got is an empty mind to aspire to in the race for image power status and control at the top of and separate from the world. I'll give up soon and let you all destroy yourselves and future generations if you want. There's always a problem with someone else, so it must especially be the ones who are telling you that there doesn't have to be. And never was for them for decades. If they'll do it to me, then no one is safe. Because I'm historically the least critical person around. (That everyone comes to to he

Update 4:

There is no empirical evidence that an empty concept called "mental health" exists and no empirical evidence that a made up concept called "mental illness" is valid.

Contribute to destroying by backing it up then. I was already born with everything perfect for me (a baby that didn't cry at all), so why should I bother. The only point in sticking around really was to help other people have things more perfect for them. Otherwise I've pretty much finished anyway, long ago. The only one that likes everyone, everyone agrees is wrong. Because the people who think everyone's wrong say so. Smart thinking. Go and get some harmful drugs forced into you, and see if you change your mind. Any volunteers for harmful drugs to check for yourseleves?

Update 5:

I'm the one that's been through the system twice with a five and a half year gap in between to thoroughly check and understand how the system works (and that it's the same both times) endured all of the suffering and torture (when I could tell at a glance in multiple different ways that it couldn't be beneficial to begin with.

Not for me, but for the benefit of everyone. And I'm telling you all how to get off the hook, because I've found a better empty concept that everyone more deserves than the one that they've got just for themselves only. And can't help themselves putting everyone in the other basket and harming them, in numerous psychological and physical ways, and historically any "spiritual" person would know straight away what an extreme danger it was. Who created people? Who alters and re-creates them now against their wishes? Where does free will come from? Who tries to steal it and throw it away now? Who has no free will (empty conc

Update 6:

... (empty concept) now. Who forces? And never takes "No" for answer. What in anything spiritual is completely and utterly unshareable? What "spiritual" has a top down overbearing domineering double-binding control hierarchy that forces people to be in the wrong?

With an inner circle (that has the opposite that is just an empty concept checked against nothing) with not even a fake promise to people forcibly recruited for "mental illness" of reaching the inner circle?

Update 7:

Ali. I'm already well discharged from the system. For a second time, with a big gap between. If I was thinking only of myself, the best thing for me would be to be extremely quiet and say nothing (but that wouldn't be best for me, because I would be behaving extremely unethically if I did that, and that would not be satisfactory to me). "Super Mental Health" turns the tables, because then they have to prove that their "Mental Health" is better and it can't be because it's non-shareable negative pointed with drugs forced. And the one I've offered is superior because it's sharable and nothing negative. Otherwise no different. It throws the test back so they aren't automatically unassailably right that everyone else is wrong. Effectively noone in the UK currently has any human rights protection or any real defence against this harmful stuff. Only the one that can say noone deserves it, is validly entitled to contradict me, because I am alre

Update 8:

I am not joking. It's a train to human disaster steaming ahead. And everyone is getting trained up to think more and more people are "mentally ill" and that's particularly pointed more aggressively at people who want agree with that, that increasing of people are inferior and to be treated that way. If someone is ahead in some real way, they help others to reach the same, not rubbish them and forcibly alter them and dump them with everything wrong. And I'm not stupid if you think clever matters. Mensa level IQ even after the drugs have caused significant damage. The others mostly wouldn't have any chance standing up to the repetitive drilling and double-binds that they are irretrievably all wrong and nothing valid about them.

Update 9:

No human experience is invalid and there is no way any small group of people could decide that it is for anyone else, unless you agree that your own experience is invalid and useless.

I am right brain dominant, so not a chance that any analytical critical negative person could have the slightest understanding of how I function, but they decide they know and that it should be destroyed. Right brain dominant are more like young children in some ways and are nicer to people, and do not force anything on anyone at all (nothing). There is no point attempting to mess them up, because no chance of any harm to anyone, unless really really messed by drugs. But still very highly unlikely. Would just be incapacitated. People are all different. Can't fit what other people want without biases feeding that they are wrong anyway. Look at theist/atheist arguments. But psychiatry picking through, adjusting, selecting, accumulating "something wrong"->drugs. Can't remotely be right

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Tony
    Lv 6
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    oh dear .... seems like you have all the answers! you know more than those medical professionals who are trying to help you!

    no point trying to answer this, you know it all already!

    good luck following your novel!

  • c3pnis
    Lv 6
    8 years ago

    In order for one to be in charge, one would first have to exist. So far, no good empirical evidence has been found that supports the existence of such a thing.

  • 8 years ago

    God is in charge, of course your argument makes sense. But Zeus isn't the only one in charge; so are the other Gods and Goddesses of Mt. Olympus.

  • 8 years ago

    I would extend your stay in the loony bin a little longer if I were you...Q_Q

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 8 years ago

    I was going to read this but I saw it was just a big long rant... No.

    Source(s): My opinion.
  • 8 years ago

    wewewe

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.