bernard hopkins vs chris eubank who would have won?

Chris Eubank is surely the better Super Middleweight, since Bernard Hopkins never fought there, but that doesn't mean anything. Styles make fights. Not size. So anyways, Eubank did have many credible wins such as the one against Nigel Benn, but power isn't enough to beat a skilled technician like Bernard Hopkins. Like Maurice said, if it is held in the UK, hometown advantage might happen, and Eubank could get the nod by close decision. Either way, it's close. Eubank would apply pressure to Hopkins with his power and keep it close with that, but Hopkins will box him brilliantly, pulling every trick in the book, winning a close one.

Bernard Hopkins by close unanimous decision.

B-Hop. Eubank had a good chin and a great heart, but Hopkins has too much class and ring smarts to let a guy like Eubank get the better of him. A comprehensive judge's decision win for Hopkins.

if the fight is held in the uk, you can almost guarantee a split decision nod for eubank.

held on neutral territory, hopkins takes it by 3 or 4 rounds on the scorecards.