Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Bill P
Lv 7
Bill P asked in SportsCricket · 7 years ago

Mitchell and Stokes both charged for making contact with each other. What will be the result?

They were both charged for making physical contact with each other (argy bargy). If found guilty they could both be suspended for a game. If this did happen, which team would be worse off.

The alternative to suspension would be a fine.

Update:

Quite right johnh, Mitch was standing his ground and Stokes ran to him but I think Stokes would be a worse loss for the poms as they lose a bowler and a batsman whereas we have Faulkner, McDermottm Cutting and Copeland to name a few.

Update 2:

Quite right johnh, Mitch was standing his ground and Stokes ran to him but I think Stokes would be a worse loss for the poms as they lose a bowler and a batsman whereas we have Faulkner, McDermottm Cutting and Copeland to name a few.

Update 3:

Quite right johnh, Mitch was standing his ground and Stokes ran to him but I think Stokes would be a worse loss for the poms as they lose a bowler and a batsman whereas we have Faulkner, McDermottm Cutting and Copeland to name a few.

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago

    Johnson would be terribly missed especially on the WACA, apparently they have already been found not guilty and are free to play.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    You're kidding?

    Talk about exchanging the queen for a pawn.

    You would hope that common sense prevails and that it's left at a caution.

  • Rohan
    Lv 6
    7 years ago

    maybe it was some cheap tactics of england to suspend johnson

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.