Should Extradition laws be changed or not?

Sometimes the real criminals are the ones hiding "behind the law" just like as in the case with Edward Snowden, this guy who leaked N.S.A. information of how our privacy rights had all been violated, and of how the NSA has been secretly probing into all our information that they did not need to be probing into, this guy was a hero and those who were behind the law were the real criminals. Therefore it is only right that he gets to find refuge in Russia and hopefully now in Brazil. We don't really need new Extradiction laws, and if we did, other nations could ignore them anyways.

No

Different Countrys Have Different Laws And There Is No Moral Universalism

For Example: Should The US Really Extradite To Suadi Arabia Someone Who Was Arrested For Violating Islamic Law?

Sry Just Noticed You Said Serious Criminals.

Well Still. The Western Conception Of Justice Is That People Cant Be Reformed. We Have No Moral High Ground. If We Attempted To Reform People So That They Could Be Integrated Into Society Instead Of Trapping Them In The Vicious Circle Of Crime Then Maybe.

And What Is A Serious Criminal? Is Snowden One Because Some In The Govt Call Him A Traitor?

No. If all laws were the same everywhere, I would say yes. But because there are disparate laws, many of which we don't agree with, there is no way we would want to guarantee everyone gets extradited.

For example, in the US, we have freedom of speech. You can't be prosecuted for speaking out against the government. In North Korea, you can be executed for it. So say a North Korean escaped to the US. Are you implying they should be sent back to be executed for expressing a negative comment toward their government? They are a criminal by North Korean standards but they're not by ours.

The laws and borders and jurisdictions of foreign countries must be respected.

No. Different countries have different laws.