what is the good DSLR camera to buy with very clear photos and the range under 700 $ ?

For your budget that would be the new D3300.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1023353-REG/...

It is supposed to gain a slight boost in sharpness over the D3200 or D5200 by eliminating the anti-alias filter, like the D5300 which is over your budget. The new 18-55mm is supposed to be more compact. Whether they will refine the sharpness any, I don't know.

If you want more telephoto, and want to keep the cost down, there is the 55-300mm AF-S VR, still $400. If you try to go cheaper by getting the cheapo 70-300mm you get inferior quality, no autofocus, and no VR.

If you get a good sample, the $450 Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD could be a worthwhile step up in image quality. Don't get the cheapo Tamron or cheapo Sigma 70-300mm.

These telephotos are kind of front heavy, and you need to get a tripod with a good medium duty three way panhead. Lighter tripod heads are going to be a struggle.

What did you not like about the 650D? The STM lenses are reputed to be sharp. They have some chromatic aberration, but the 650D is supposed to have optional processor correction. Canon is reputed to set contrast and sharpening high by default, but these can be adjusted.

You have asked this question several times over the last few months and have received very reasonable answers.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the quality of photos taken with a Canon 650D provided that the camera and lens are working properly and the camera user is operating it within design limits for the lighting and distances required in the shot.

Even if you have a good telephoto lens and even if your lens is image-stabilised you are still going to have to deal with the effects of camera shake and subject movement at long-range.

Yo deal with camera shake use a heavy tripod. To deal with subject movement increase the ISO so that the shutter speed can be faster.

You need 1/125 second or ideally 1/250.

There's nothing wrong with the quality of the photos in the EOS 650D.

Look at the Nikon D3200 and Pentax K-500 as well - if you like video, the Sony SLT A-58 has a slight edge.

Any of them are capable of superb quality if you make the effort to learn to use them properly, and it's all down to the way they feel in your hands.

If you don't like the quality of photos from an EOS650 then you need to multiply your budget by at least 5 to get a full frame DSLR.

Assuming you actually mean an EOS650D and not a 35mm SLR EOS650

It doesn't really matter which dslr you choose. They are all pretty good these days. You're photo didn't turn out well can be many different factors; poor lighting, hands not steady, not focused properly, subject was moving. Now if you are a pixel peeper, nothing will probably satisfy you unless you shoot f8 at 1/1000 shutter speed all the time.

If you can't get very clear photos with a 650D, you won't with any other dSLR out there. They are all basically the same. You are better off with a cheap point-and-shoot camera.

All of the major DSLR cameras will produce excellent photos if used correctly.

The quality of pix is mostly that 7 inches behind the camera. If you want to try other cameras, try these.

Canon T3i - $550, Nikon D5100 - $430, Sony SLT A57 - $470, Pentax K30 $580

http://www.beachcamera.com/shop/product.aspx?sku=C...

http://www.beachcamera.com/shop/product.aspx?sku=N...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=sr_pg_2?rh=i%3Aaps%2...

http://www.beachcamera.com/shop/product.aspx?sku=P...