Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Nikon Coolpix L27 Vs. L820?
Hi!
I have Nikon Coolpix L27.
Features:
5x Optical Zoom and 4x Digital Zoom
2.7 inch TFT LCD
16.1 Megapixel Camera
CCD Image Sensor
f/3.2 - f/6.5 Aperture
HD Recording
35 mm Equivalent Focal Length: 26 - 130 mm
I was looking for a new camera that's Nikon L820:
Features
CMOS Image Sensor
16 Megapixel Camera
30x Optical Zoom and 4x Digital Zoom
Full HD Recording
3 inch TFT LCD with Anti-reflection Coating
35 mm Equivalent Focal Length: 22.5 - 675 mm
f/3 - f/5.8 Aperture
Except the higher zoom level in L820, does it worth upgrading camera?
Do I get better results in an Advanced Point and shoot than only P'n'S camera?
4 Answers
- AWBoaterLv 77 years ago
Both of these cameras, as all "L" series cameras, are entry level compacts. I have many Nikon cameras, but I dislike the "L" and "S" series Nikon compacts, as they are too basic, and may not be the best performers.
I would highly recommend Nikon "P" series compact cameras, as they are vastly superior to the "L" series. The Nikon Coolpix P330 for instance would be a far better camera.
http://www.althephoto.com/cameras/p330.php
The difference between the two cameras you mention is nil, as they are both just low-end basic cameras. I won't go so far as to say they are dogs, as you get what you pay for. You can get a L27 for less than $75, so you have to put it's performance against that perspective. But especially with the L820, you are paying way too much for that camera.
You will get more of a zoom with the L820, but big deal - high power zoom lenses on bridge cameras tend to have worse optical quality. And you almost always need to carry along a tripod to get blur-free photos when zoomed all the way in. So why get an all-powerful zoom if it isn't very practical?
You can get the P330 on clearance for about the same price as the L820, and the P330 is a vastly superior camera. And I'd take a good 5x zoom over a marginal 30x zoom any day... even if that means having to get a bit closer.
- 7 years ago
Adding more zoom range to a crappy camera that crams too many megapixels into a tiny 1/2.3" sensor won't improve the quality.
If you want to improve the quality, get a P340, or a P330 on clearance, while they last.
Or more expensively and better featured is the P7800.
If you want more zoom, the Canon SX510 HS is a little bit better than the Nikon L cameras because it only squeezes 12 MP into a tiny 1/2.3" sensor.
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_PowerShot_...
Of course the Canon SX cameras with their little 1/2.3" sensors are not as good as the 1/1.7" sensor cameras such as some of the Nikon P (but not the superzoom P, which still use the tiny 1/2.3" sensors), or Canon S, or Canon G.
- retiredPhilLv 77 years ago
The L820 has many advantages over the L27. Scroll down on this comparison and read about them.
http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L27-vs-N...
An advanced P&S will give you better performance, such as low light. Consider these cameras.
Sony RX-100 II, Canon G16, Olympus XZ-2, Fujifilm X20, Olympus Stylus 1, Panasonic LX7, Pentax MX-1, Nikon P7800
- Anonymous7 years ago
Nikon L820 is a excellent camera and will also give you better macro mode, Full HD video recording. If you can afford you should go for Nikon L820