Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

So, my fellow Australians, who else is left shaking their heads over this one?

A letter to the Sun Herald this morning quotes the following, from a question to George Cochrane "Your Question", June 1st. The questioner "has $50,000 in the bank, an investment property with a net worth of $262,000, $450,000 of bullion and a self-managed super fund worth at least $600,000. She is on Newstart Allowance. She has now inherited property worth almost $2 million, but apparently is still able to manipulate assets so that both she and her partner still remain eligible for Centrelink benefits."

Is this part of our problem? That people who are, to my mind, so affluent, still able to obtain benefits? What's going on here?

And I thought negative gearing was something we could do away with and instantly raise billions!!!!

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    She might be able to get around Newstart asset tests, until she is able to receive what has been left to her in the estate, for up to 12 months. If she's calling the investment property her main residence and the bullion asset is not technically owned in her name, quite possibly she can claim Newstart.

    The $50,000 cash in the bank sounds tricky, though. I think the cash asset limit is quite low, so maybe she has the account in someone else's name or offshore.

    It is extremely unethical of her to claim Newstart, that's for sure.

  • C.M. C
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    Hey OzNana, I still maintain that Australia has dug a hole for itself where it comes to welfare benefits. Your situation has not just emerged, but has been growing out of hand for years.

    What you picture in your question is unacceptable.

  • Deb
    Lv 6
    7 years ago

    It wouldnt hurt to look into the legality of many who claim benefits.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    The very wealthy expect there to be loopholes, and they're usually not disappointed.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Patty
    Lv 4
    7 years ago

    The Abbott/Hockey government allows loopholes for the rich to get richer, while the poor get poorer

  • 7 years ago

    Sounds like some kind of propaganda campaign to discredit Centrelink to me.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.