Spiritually speaking, Why isn't embryo transfer offered as an option for mothers who are unable/unwilling to carry to term?

Embryo transfer is done before the placenta attaches in cattle specifically fertilized in a controlled setting. Are you now planning on dragging women into fertility clinics, fertilizing them and flushing out the zygote while still in the first few cleavages to transfer to some other woman?

http://www.humble.k12.tx.us/cms/lib2/TX01001414/Ce...

It is not possible to surgically transfer an attached placenta to another uterus. Human blastocysts are developed enough for implantation by day 5 or 6 in the first week. After implantation the only current option is abortion, until a surgical transferal process is developed.

Too bad we can't insert the embryo into the bodies of the anti-choice males. But I'll settle for transfer into the bodies of anti-choice females.

BTW, it's not a baby until it's born.

Humans are significantly more complex than cattle or horses. Beyond that, the human life is often too valuable to risk. A lost human life is much more meaningful than a lost cow or horse.

If Christian women were serious about saving the unborn they'd be offering up their wombs as surrogates.

It's been done.

secular people needs embryos for stem cells trying to stay alive for ever.

I selected your answer as the best, hope we can talk about the Bible.

exactly.

Why aren't we working on artificial wombs too? Those would also help many premature infants as well.

The answer is that the troglodytes don't really give a fig about the poor little fetuses, they just want to punish women. Just look at all the poor, neglected, abused, living children suffering in this world. They don't care at all about helping them, or helping single moms either. It's the same people who want to cut benefits to poor mothers and their children. Hypocrites.