Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 6
? asked in Science & MathematicsPhysics · 7 years ago

Why can't quantum entanglement be used to send information faster than the speed of light?

I never understood why quantum entanglement couldn't be used to send information. The usual answer is that knowing what a wave function collapsed to doesn't change the fact that it does so randomly, and thus cannot transmit information. But that's not what I mean. Why can't you use the fact that the waves collapse to send information? When I asked my undergraduate physics professor about it (a long time ago), he just gave me a weird look and told me it can't work. Still, I've never understood why that is, and I've always been curious.

To be specific, I'll link a YouTube video explaining the quantum eraser experiment. You only need to watch the first minute and a half to understand what I am talking about:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQfSm6o-KlQ

Using the experimental set up in the video, I do not see what would prevent someone at M1 from sending information via Morse code to someone at M2. Specifically, have switching M1 on and off play the role of the on-off tone for Morse code.

This would be sending information at a rate that is nearly instantaneous, only being limited by the rate at which the Morse code representation of the information can be encoded/decoded.

Am I missing something?

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I don't know about collapsing wave functions, but entangled photons can be used to alter spins concurrently for the twins. And that has be observered and detected up to two kilometers apart.

    So I think one can send ** ** ** **** **** **** ** ** ** where each * is a spin change. Never mind to what direction, just the change suffices.

    If you can read what I sent by spin changes, then you know I don't see why entangled twins can't be used to send information.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    I think the question answers itself. You said that knowing what a wave function collapsed to doesn't change the fact that it does so randomly. If it does so randomly you couldn't extract any information from it.

  • 7 years ago

    how do you know the wave has collapsed at the receiver end?

    If you "observe" it, don't you collapse it yourself?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.