Were Mike Brown's fingerprints ever found on Officer Wilson's firearm?

Question

Still trying to look into the Grand Jury evidence;  https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1370519-grand-jury-volume-6.html   Does anyone know if fingerprints were ever confirmed on Officer Wilson's firearm?

Here is a snippet of the testimony of Officer Wilson, "After being punched again, Wilson said, he considered reaching for his mace spray, but he was worried he’d get some of it in his own eyes, which would blind him, “and I would have been out of the game.” So he went for his gun, a Sig Sauer .40 pistol, which had twelve bullets in the magazine and one in the chamber, and said to Brown, “Get back or I am going to shoot you.”

At this point, Wilson testified, Brown “grabs my gun, says, ‘You are too much of a pussy to shoot me.’ ” Brown then pushed the gun down toward Wilson’s thigh, the officer went on, and a pulling match ensued, during which Wilson twice tried to shoot the gun, but it didn’t go off. Eventually, it did, blowing out one of the windows and drawing blood from somewhere on Brown’s body. The gunfire startled both of them, Wilson said. Brown took a step back, and then looked up at him with “the most intense aggressive face. The only way I can describe it, it looks like a demon, that’s how angry he looked. He comes back towards me again with his hands up.”"

I don't have any dog in this fight but I'd like to get a clearer image of facts as best I can given what information or lack of that the grand jury was provided.

Anonymous · Answer

Really don't matter if Brown's fingerprints were found on Officer Wilson's firearm, Wilson was acquitted by a grand Jury, so the evidence shows Wilson was not in the wrong. I believe this scumbag thug brown got just what he deserved.

Avohom Carpenter · Answer

Blood being in the car doesnt mean he had the gun at all. Just that he was close to the car when he was shot initially. If he is at the window...or being grabbed at like the eye witness testifies...and is shot at close range as reported than blood could easily be in the car or splatter on the gun. Blood in the vehicle is still consistant with the train of event Dorian Johnson gave of a tussle of the officer grabbing him and mike pushing back to free hisself and the him being shot initially at that point.

Anonymous · Answer

(CNN) -- Forensic tests have found the blood of Michael Brown on the gun, uniform and police cruiser belonging to Officer Darren Wilson, who fatally shot the unarmed teen two months ago in Ferguson, Missouri, The New York Times reported.
The revelation, provided by unnamed government officials familiar with a federal civil rights investigation, marked the first public account of Wilson's testimony to investigators.

see link:  http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/18/justice/michael-brown-darren-wilson-account/index.html

bikinisquad3000 · Answer

The people telling you the blood/wound evidence proves he was holding the gun (which it doesn't) are apparently doing so to avoid giving you the direct answer to your question, which is: they didn't test the gun for fingerprints. Seriously.

lestermount · Answer

his blood was inside the car along with two contact wounds, meaning he was shot while holding onto the gun.
Realize that fingerprints are much harder to find and identify than what you see on t.v.

Slickterp · Answer

All the evidence has been released, look it up.

Trending News

Were Mike Brown's fingerprints ever found on Officer Wilson's firearm?

6 Answers