how come Saddam uses "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" and hes condemned for it, Bush uses it and hes a beacon of honest to goodness...?

Saddam's tatctics went a bit further than to threaten to do something. Your question makes you sound like a lover of jihadist pigs? Are yOU?

Torturing one's enemy isn't to gain information, it's used as punishment. Saddam's enemies were the general population and allies of the U.S. with his sons doing it for fun.

You might want to read this information on Saddam's human rights' violations before you further make a fool of yourself:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Sadda...

You just reminded me...As it turns out Bush & Cheney...they were looking for a reason to invade Iraq long before 9/11 and even said a NEW PEARL HARBOR from one of those countries is what they needed to do just that..! If you don't believe that then google "PNAC"..!

I like the comparison of Bush to Saddam. Fitting.

Would it kill you to learn the difference between the rights of a legal combatant and an illegal combatant. Sheesh. What is it about liberals that you cannot seem to grasp basic distinctions, such as the distinction between a legal immigrant and an illegal one.

Obama doesn't waste time interrogating...he just sends a drone to destroy. Liberals are ok with that.

Drawing ands quartering and rape are not "waterboarding"; our Special Forces submit to it for TRAINING but I doubt they would for "Saddam's method".

Bush believed the ends would justify the means. Kind of like Hitler.

(Used)! It's because W isn't an Arab.