Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

A model of the Universe considering the energy equivalence of mass. Possible?

We have certain unanswered questions in Astrophysics like those concerning dark matter, black holes etc.

I feel for mathematical purposes and also imagination we can think of matter as a bundle of energy equivalent to E=mc^2. Once we get rid of matter we can calculate the total energy content during Big Bang and get a fair estimate of the total mass of Universe. In the stellar reactions every moment huge energies are produced which is actually destroyed matter and this is going on for 14bn years across the Universe. This way we can estimate the energy equivalent of a black hole too and get rid of the infinite density. In that way I think the integral of all energies will give a quantity where the missing mass problem gets solved. May be, may not be. My maths is not good enough for this. Can a mathematical model be evolved which will consider total energy content of present known matter, radiated energy for the lifetime of the Universe starting from that of big bang and those of black holes. We do get a fair approximation of the mass of black holes from measuring it's gravitational force. I know one would need a PhD to even attempt that but am I sensible. But this model suits my imagination as I can ged rid of the infinite density problem of black holes or the whole Universes being concentrated in a point at t=0. Apart from that to retain sanity I've developed two block-heads. 1. Entropy = +ve, 2. Time = +ve always.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 6 years ago

    I do have a model but that's too complicated to express in words and yes, my maths ends with Vector Calculus.so I will need a masters. So it's not possible for me to express the model in equations.

    I don't think anybody has considered Sigma Energy t=0 to t=present(14bn years). And it's the integral of all the energy emitted from beginning till now.

  • 6 years ago

    >> Can a mathematical model be evolved which will consider total energy ...

    Well, actually, that's the model that's been used for over 20 years. And there have been models before that, going all the way back to 1922, that also included total energy.

    You need at least a masters degree to understand them fully, I think.

  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    The calculations have already been done, the energy of the observable universe (including the mass-energy equivalence) is 2×10^69 J (joules).

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    You "think", it is "your opinion" and you have no mathematical structure, model or hypothesis.

    There is indeed a blockhead.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.