Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Is Sony the victim in their decision to not release "The Interview"?

Their attorney, David Boies, was on Meet the Press this morning arguing that it was the distributors (movie theaters) that whimped out, not Sony.

SECOND QUESTION if you're interested...

David Boies, lead counsel for Vice President Gore in the 2000 election case and counsel for the plaintiffs in the California Prop 8 case really tried to bring home the point that North Korea was the culprit. He used phrases like "state sponsored criminal act," "threat to national security," "state sponsored attack" and "national security threat." He was redirecting every question to that specific idea, much like a politician always tries to get to his stump in an interview.

Do you think Sony stands to get some money from the US Government if it's ruled a matter of National Security instead of Sony security of if it's ruled that the act was "State sponsored?" I'm not sure but David Boies wasn't there for the fun of it. He had a mission when he decided to be on MTP. Does anyone know?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • Yeti
    Lv 7
    6 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    It was indeed the theaters that didn't want to take chances showing it. Sony can't force them to. And if enough theaters say don't bother, it can make a lot less sense to attempt a theater release. They are looking to do something like online or electronic distribution, but even sites like Netflix and Amazon are not yet biting. It's probably not worth it to them to risk some massive electronic attack on their own sites.

    Yes, Sony may receive some financial support if this is viewed as a state-sponsored, national security thing. But that determination will be made independently of what they themselves say. And the U.S. is going to be trying to get North Korea to pay for what occurred directly.

    I'd lay off of blaming Sony. Their main mistake is making the movie to begin with. If another country did some "comedy" about a couple guys trying to do an equivalent U.S. assassination, even including "real world" names and everything, it probably wouldn't be viewed as so funny in the U.S. They also knew enough to get approval of the U.S. government, I believe via the State Department, and they got the okay to go ahead. The Hollywood types need to be a bit more careful messing in politics, frankly, especially when they set out #1 to mock the assassination of current leaders of other countries.

    Anyway, I think Sony should distribute still. It just may make sense for this to be the first major movie distributed "for free" via something like torrents, supported by ads. Will they likely have another hacking for that? Sure. But that's what they should do, even if the U.S. government needs to back them up some more. And they can prepare for a fresh hacking, and trace it even further.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    no, this smells of a publicity stunt to get their crap film in the head lines

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.