Should Hillary Clinton invite Rupert Murdoch to her inauguration?

For 35 years cons have been accusing Hillary of everything one could possibly imagine, and not one bit of it has stuck because it's all made up nonsense.

I don't care who she invites to her inauguration -- only that she has one.

.

Rupert Murdoch is a big time Clinton backer, so he will be there regardless. But I can guarantee that Hillary will not be President.

From fox she would have to invite Saudi Prince talal, he is more of a share holder than Rupert is.

I and most Liberals prefer Elizabeth warren but she won't run.Anyway fox is only satire, only the brutally ignorant take them serious.

The thing is most of the the things Fox is saying about her are true. Not only that, she is not the symbol of a powerful woman. She is a woman controlled by her husband who was sued for cheating on Hilary with a number of different women. Once feminists figure out who she really is they will destroy her chances.

I thought Democrats didn't watch Fox News?

"outrageous crimes and each has been disproven" the ability to hide evidence and lie about it does NOT equate to disproven, unproven maybe, but NOT disproven. If I rob a bank wearing gloves and a mask and when asked if I did it or not, I say no, does not mean I did not rob the bank, only there is no evidence of my having done so.

Absolutely Not.

Hillary won't get the nomination. Sorry.

She's not going to have one