Anybody want to talk about how UGLY the HILDABEAST is, and how she so wrong and unqualified to be a dog catcher much less POTUS???

I don't really care about her appearance, I DO care about her dishonesty, the whole email scandal, and her total lack of accomplishment as Secretary of State. In almost every country and region of the world you can name, our position has been degraded since she took office. And I also agree with her being unqualified to be dog catcher, she never was able to control the zipper of that horn dog husband of hers!

I like TO use my CAPS KEY AT random too.

Hilary would make for a fine prez. Or a dog catcher, that works too. As long as she doesn't become a nude model, I don't really care what she does.

You make yourself look very misinformed when you post questions like this..

And here's why:

The correct spelling for the creature you're referring to is "wildebeest". Therefore you should have spelled it "HILDEBEEST" not "HILDABEAST".

Not only that but you didn't include the word "FACT" in your question. Why should I believe what you have to say if it isn't a fact?

Agreed. It is a PROVEN FACT that the Hildabeast is not qualified to be president.

dogcatchers are humane. the POTUS is not in that category.

You must not have any actual arguments if you have to resort to name calling.

.