Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

How does one internalize many theorems quickly?

I know kids who go to MOPs (or whatever the abbreviation is) for the USAMO/IMO stuff go through a ton of material/problems in a short amount of time.

I wish to go through the IMO Compendium on my own.

There are 166 thereoms I'd have to internalize. Any thoughts as to how to do this effectively?

Likewise, if xyzzy reads this, please look back at my Riemann question and elaborate based on my comments.

1 Answer

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 6
    6 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Hm, interesting. Only did a few math competitions myself, which I mildly regret; didn't have anyone to push me in that direction growing up--ah well, that's neither here nor there. I imagine it would be quite difficult to internalize those theorems from just the IMO Compendium's nice summary. They would mostly be disconnected facts with very little, probably too little, context.

    To pick some random examples, Theorem 2.13 on solving linear recurrence relations by factoring a polynomial is more summarizing the result of the standard approach to such problems (off the top of my head, it would certainly be discussed in Wilf's very readable generatingfunctionology, perhaps somewhat less generally) than giving you the approach. Similarly, it gives both Langrange's theorem and Fermat's Little Theorem without mentioning that the latter is a corollary of the former or the importance of the group structure of Z/pZ to the whole thing. Theorem 2.127 gives the standard parameterization of Pythagorean triples, but it's not connected to Theorem 2.98 which gives the rational parameterization of the unit circle and which is the key tool for actually proving the standard parameterization. It's the idea of the parameterization of Pythagorean triples rather than the result that you'd probably be expected to generalize in a contest problem anyway.

    So, I suppose I'd slog through the problems themselves, reading plenty of solutions and trying a good chunk yourself without help (maybe with a self-imposed time limit, so you don't get stuck). If you find you're often running up against the use of theorems from the list, then you'd have a clear reason to internalize a relevant subset. You might also want to look up more information (e.g. reading the Wikipedia page on Fermat's Little Theorem) to supplement descriptions of results which are too sketchy to grab hold of.

    Best of luck!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.