Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Below, identify: a) The null hypothesis b) The alternative hypothesis c) The test statistic d) The P-value e) The conclusion about the null?

Below, identify:

a) The null hypothesis

b) The alternative hypothesis

c) The test statistic

d) The P-value

e) The conclusion about the null hypothesis

f) The final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

1)

In a clinical study of an allergy drug, 108 of the 202 subjects reported experiencing significant relief from their

symptoms. At the 0.01 significance level, test the claim that more than half of all those using the drug experience

relief.

how would I solve this?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 6 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    a) Ho: Patients using the allergy drug are NOT experiencing significant relief

    Ho: p = 0.5

    b) Ha: Patients using the allergy drug are experiencing significant relief

    Ha: p > 0.5 (right tailed test)

    c) Test statistic = z

    Sample proportion = p^ = x/n = 108/202 = 0.5347

    Standard error of p = SEp = sqrt [ p*(1-p)/n]

    = sqrt [0.5*0.5/202]

    = 0.5/sqrt 202

    z = [p^ - p] / SEp

    z = [0.5347 - 0.5] / [0.5/sqrt 202] = + 0.99

    d) p-value = P(z > 0.99)

    = 1 - P(z < 0.99)

    = 1 - 0.8389

    = 0.1611

    e) Since p-value (0.1611) > the alpha value (0.01), it can be said that there is NO evidence

    to REJECT the Ho

    f) Therefore, the test failed to support the claim. It can be inferred that the patients using the allergic drug are NOT experiencing significant relief

  • 6 years ago

    because u did it wrong or the teacher was confuse

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.