Primary vs. secondary source help?

I'm writing a paper on a man named Andreas Vesalius. He's an anatomist from the 16th century that helped to revolutionize our understanding of the human body. I found this website online, and I wanted to know if this would be considered a primary or secondary source.

I'm trying to find information on how Vesalius has impacted our world presently, and I found this company (named Materialise) that said that Vesalius was an inspiration to them.

"Vesalius is an inspiration to Materialise as his mission is similar to ours: to advance anatomical understanding for improved clinical outcomes. His vivid drawings brought the field of anatomy into a different era, helped physicians learn about the human body, and led to an improved understanding of human anatomy. The Mimics Innovation Suite software builds on Vesalius’s achievements, by providing a tool for doctors and researchers to visualize a specific patient’s anatomy. Materialise, particularly through its newly released Mimics 17.0 and 3-matic 9.0 updates, is celebrating the life and work of Andreas Vesalius by continuing his quest to advance anatomical understanding through Engineering on Anatomy™."

What, do you think, this would be considered as?

Thanks.