If the meteorologists can't get it right, what makes folks think that the climatologists can either?

Here's a better rebuttal against man-made global warming: CO2 accounts for approximately 4% of the greenhouse effect, while water vapor accounts for over 95% of the greenhouse effect. The keys is the difference between a molecule of CO2 and one of H2O. CO2 is a linear molecule, so it only has 3 possible vibrational states. This means it can only absorb a small range of radiation. H2O, however, is a bending molecule. It has 6 different vibrational states. It can absorb radiation across the spectrum, overlapping the wavelengths that CO2 can absorb. This is why water vapour is the dominant greenhouse gas and CO2 is insignificant.

And if you go back to what the models were predicting 10 or even 5 years ago you will see how unreliable they are.

lol you don't have a meteorological clue. what a dumbfook

Snow is made of what ? Water

The source of that water is what ? Evaporation

The cause of that evaporation is what ? Heat

Therefore by increasing the rate of evaporation global warming can and does cause heavy snowfalls

In fact some of the heaviest snowfalls in NYC history have happened in March when warm moist air moving north from the Gulf and the Atlantic collides with a cold Artic air mass moving south

I live 3 miles from the Gulf and it's current temp is 75 F

i just got done shoveling almost the exact amount of snow forecasted from my driveway right here in south central pennsylvania.

so much for your skepticism.

You really should take a science course.

Exactly. There is only one absolute in our world, and that is the Holy Bible.