Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Is Canon 7d mark 2 a better choice than nikon d7200 for portrait photography?
so i bought a nikon d7200 few months ago and im not satisfied with its performance with my portraits and sports photography so im planning to sell it after few days and i wanted to know if 7d mark 2 is a better camera for portraits cause im planning to buy one soon!!
btw i used nikon d7200 with a tamrons 24-70 mm 2.8g lens and the pic quality was worse than a nikon or canons standard DSLR'S !
9 Answers
- 4 years ago
The Canon (or even a Pentax) won't do anything the Nikon can't.
Basically, the camera/lens isn't the problem here.
- Anonymous4 years ago
HOW CAN YOU SAY THAT ENRIQUE IGLESIAS WHO HAS SOLD MORE THAN 130 MILLIONS OF ALBUMS AND HAS 210 MILLIONS IS NOT FAMOUS AS RICKY MARTIN WHO HAS SOLD 65 MILLIONS OF ALBUMS AND HAS 65 MILLIONS??????ENRIQUE IS WAYYYYYYYYYYYY BETTER!
- Anonymous4 years ago
Possibly the lens is the problem, though Tamron is one of the top three independent lens makers, and has a good reputation.
Frankly, you have an excellent camera, and I doubt that changing brand will satisfy you in terms of quality - both Canon and Nikon are excellent.
You should get some guidance face-to-face from somebody who knows about such matters, and who can look at your pics and find out where the problem is. Is your camera properly set up for Resolution and Quality?
Indeed, unless you are in stratospheric areas in your quality demands, you should get good or excellent results from crop-frame DSLRs. Crop-frame cameras from good brands have so much quality available that you will very seldom come near to pushing them to their limits.
So, get some local advice before spending quite a lot of money.
- keerokLv 74 years ago
All dSLRs are basically the same. You will get the same picture no matter what dSLR you use. Picture quality depends mostly on your skill.
Getting a more expensive camera will not improve your shots. It will only make shooting easier, if you know what you're doing. If not, you at least get more bragging rights.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- ?Lv 64 years ago
Without seeing the "horrible" shots, it's not possible to really determine what's the problem here. Based on the body/lens combo, the bad image quality is almost certainly user error.
The 7d II will be significantly better for sports and wildlife than the D7200, but when taking a shot of a person standing still with a f/2.8 zoom, you won't notice much of a difference at all.
- Land-sharkLv 74 years ago
Not happy with portraits? Your camera is a good as any other, just buy a 3-point lighting system and learn techniques. (Focus on the eyes, you and the model need teamwork to get good results.)
Sports? The 7D Mk 2 might make it easier with its 10fps rather than 6fps. But if you anticipate the sport well that may not be necessary.
- BriaRLv 74 years ago
It is a poor workman who blames his tools.
If you can't take a good portrait with a D7200 then the problem is not the camera and replacing it will not help one iota.
Spend your money on some lessons to improve your skills.
- ?Lv 74 years ago
The Canon (or even a Pentax) won't do anything the Nikon can't.
Basically, the camera/lens isn't the problem here.
- SordenhiemerLv 74 years ago
Portrait photography is all about lighting and photographer skill. If you give both those cameras (with equivalent lenses) to a competent portrait photographer you will see absolutely no difference in the final image.